...............................   -therefore jesus.

(August 28, 2018 at 11:31 am)Huggy74 Wrote: One horned animals do exist...

So now you're resorting to semantics rather than the logic behind the argument. Typical.

(August 28, 2018 at 11:27 am)Huggy74 Wrote:

(August 28, 2018 at 11:26 am)Khemikal Wrote: Well, you don't have to sit back and shout hosanna, thanking the person harvesting you for organs.  There's always that.  That would just be weird.

So are mullets...to each his own...

I keep telling myself that everytime I go to Germany.

(August 28, 2018 at 11:30 am)Kit Wrote:

(August 28, 2018 at 11:28 am)Huggy74 Wrote: I'm sure there are colors beyond the ability of your eye to see, so it's not at all irrelevant.

It's easy enough to state a falsehood rather than accept the truth.  "Oh, there are more colors in existence than we can perceive".

Yes, that is how charlatans make money.  Try something more logical, bitch.

That was logical.

We see color based on the red, green and blue cones in our eyes, anything that isn't a variation of those colors, we are blind to.

If everyone was blind to the color red, how do you prove it's existence?

---

(August 28, 2018 at 11:32 am)Kit Wrote:

(August 28, 2018 at 11:31 am)Huggy74 Wrote: One horned animals do exist...

So now you're resorting to semantics rather than the logic behind the argument.  Typical.

Not semantics, unicorn literally mean 'one horn'.

(August 28, 2018 at 11:40 am)Huggy74 Wrote: That was logical.

We see color based on the red, green and blue cones in our eyes, anything that isn't a variation of those colors, we are blind to.

If everyone was blind to the color red, how do you prove it's existence?

Use a device, such as a camera that can also measure red. Same as with any other colour.

This is reproducible and the steps can be unambiguously described in detail.

There is no such device that can detect a god, or a soul, or a spirit or any type of supernatural force.

(August 28, 2018 at 11:43 am)Mathilda Wrote:

(August 28, 2018 at 11:40 am)Huggy74 Wrote: That was logical.

We see color based on the red, green and blue cones in our eyes, anything that isn't a variation of those colors, we are blind to.

If everyone was blind to the color red, how do you prove it's existence?

Use a device, such as a camera that can also measure red. Same as with any other colour.

This is reproducible and the steps can be unambiguously described in detail.

There is no such device that can detect a god, or a soul, or a spirit or any type of supernatural force.

How would YOU determine it's the color red without having the ability to see it for your self?

I have a feeling someone also does not know what the word "ignore" means. 

(August 28, 2018 at 11:48 am)Huggy74 Wrote:

(August 28, 2018 at 11:43 am)Mathilda Wrote: Use a device, such as a camera that can also measure red. Same as with any other colour.

This is reproducible and the steps can be unambiguously described in detail.

There is no such device that can detect a god, or a soul, or a spirit or any type of supernatural force.

How would YOU determine it's the color red without having the ability to see it for your self?

Measure its wave length directly by sending it through an transparent substance of known index of refraction?

Use a red pass or red cut filter and measure the change in the intensity of light after it passes through?  

If you even paid a millionth as much attention to your high school physics as you’ve wasted on your bible, you wouldn’t have asked questions that so ambarassingly betrayed such a disgraceful lack of interest in the probing of reality.

You see, the difference between Christian morons who think the wish-thinking primitivism that led to Christianity back in the Iron Age is end all and be all of human wisdom on the one hand, and intelligent people who benefited from the accummulated wisdom of 2000 years of science since the start of your disgraceful cult on the other, is a realization that reality exist outside of the immediate, uneducated desire and perception, and is accessible though careful consideration and experimentation based on repeatable measurement?