If a link doesn't say what you're making claims to, why link it?

There is no such scientific movement, you made that up. Your links are about meteorites, bacterial spores, and bacterial spores on meteorites.

(February 28, 2019 at 10:35 am)Gae Bolga Wrote: Was the hitchhiker dressed like 1950, half drunk and hollow eyed?

big black man dirty jeans camo jacket (woodlands pattern army) skimask/beanie needed to shave nasty work type boots. also had a bag he through in the back of my 64 ranchero

I don't think it ever happened.

(February 28, 2019 at 4:11 pm)Gae Bolga Wrote: If a link doesn't say what you're making claims to, why link it?

There is no such scientific movement, you made that up, and none of your links even mention it.

That this the difference between people like you and me. You all always need all the dots connected and colored in then the picture explained with someone hellen kellering you around the out line spelling the details out in your hand before, one of you is brave enough to say I think I see it...

panspermia is the idea of the earth being seeded sport that is my claim! I gave 4 links to this word being defined that way. each link provides different thoughts on how this can happen.

The point is science is becomming less and less convinced that life can just exist from nothing more than liquid water and carbon.. that there needs to be a catlyst a seed to grow when conditions are right. most center around meteorites, even though that is the dumbest theory since the something from nothing of darwinism as 1 a meteor has never yeilded any signs of life despite what was thought to be discovered in 97 artic find. the conditions of entry and then the sudden stop is often times enough to equate to our biggest intentional explosions by our biggest bombs... so the metorite sizr goes up to ensure enough mass or 'seed' can survive, but then so does the yeild of he explosion.. If I remember right one of those links explains this as the paradox of panspermia.. The idea being either life is possible from nothing or life was seeded some other way leaving the discussion open to aliens...

(February 28, 2019 at 4:24 pm)Drich Wrote:

(February 28, 2019 at 4:11 pm)Gae Bolga Wrote: If a link doesn't say what you're making claims to, why link it?

There is no such scientific movement, you made that up, and none of your links even mention it.

That this the difference between people like you and me. You all always need all the dots connected and colored in then the picture explained with someone hellen kellering you around the out line spelling the details out in your hand before, one of you is brave enough to say I think I see it...

panspermia is the idea of the earth being seeded sport that is my claim! I gave 4 links to this word being defined that way. each link provides different thoughts on how this can happen.

The point is science is becomming less and less convinced that life can just exist from nothing more than liquid water and carbon.. that there needs to be a catlyst a seed to grow when conditions are right. most center around meteorites, even though that is the dumbest theory since the something from nothing of darwinism as 1 a meteor has never yeilded any signs of life despite what was thought to be discovered in 97 artic find. the conditions of entry and then the sudden stop is often times enough to equate to our biggest intentional explosions by our biggest bombs... so the metorite sizr goes up to ensure enough mass or 'seed' can survive, but then so does the yeild of he explosion.. If I remember right one of those links explains this as the paradox of panspermia.. The idea being either life is possible from nothing or life was seeded some other way leaving the discussion open to aliens...

That's an awfully long winded way to say you made that shit up...and now you're lying about your own silly claim which is right here in this thread for anyone to see? I don't know why that still surprises me... but it does.

The God of the Hebrews appears to have been left far behind.

(February 28, 2019 at 10:31 am)Drich Wrote: [quote pid='1887978' dateline='1551291205']
... Wrote lots of heart felt and honestly related life experiances...

Quote: Now I'm paraphrasing the above and if you Drich want to expand/clarify/elucidate some more on the subject that's grand.

But hearing things in your head that others don't?

I hear what I understand, which I can explain in such away that you can not show me to be wrong. So rather than try, my observation is most of you take the easy way out and call me crazy..
you guys are just lazy and dishonest
[/quote]

 So... instead of understanding/accepting that I was NOT trying to quote you vebatim.

 You instead went on a long diatribe (Though obviously heartfelt) about all your life experances that you use to justify and re-inforce your ideas?

Y'know there's terms and such for that, right?

 So. Perhaps work on your reading comprehension. Will save you time in the long run.

So your mind/memory remembers the 'Hits' or 'Positive' things which reinforce your 'divinations'...

I have to ask. DO you keep an equal track of all the times that things simply don't follow along with your divinations?

Heck, how do you even tie a supposed 'Hit' with the powers that you claim to be?

It could be really grateful Leprecauns who are thanking you for that one, now loong forgotten time, when you rescued their lucky coin?

How do you tell the differance of 'Where' this divination is coming from?