Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 5, 2024, 9:45 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Watchmaker: my fav argument
RE: The Watchmaker: my fav argument
(March 9, 2021 at 8:06 pm)John 6IX Breezy Wrote: I edit my posts as often as it takes to communicate my thoughts effectively and precisely. I'm aware that might not be a concern you share lol.

I edit my posts regularly. Usually to add more content. I have seen Nudger do the same, having had to go back and read the extra content he edited into his post.
Reply
RE: The Watchmaker: my fav argument
(March 9, 2021 at 10:02 pm)Eleven Wrote:
(March 9, 2021 at 8:06 pm)John 6IX Breezy Wrote: I edit my posts as often as it takes to communicate my thoughts effectively and precisely. I'm aware that might not be a concern you share lol.

I edit my posts regularly. Usually to add more content. I have seen Nudger do the same, having had to go back and read the extra content he edited into his post.

This was an edit totally changing the tone of the post.
[Image: MmQV79M.png]  
                                      
Reply
RE: The Watchmaker: my fav argument
If you divid the whole space of universe into big chunks the size of our solar system and imagine you are at one of those chunks looking up at the sky—the sky will appear pitch black.

The nearest star at that point would be so far away that if it would explode as a supernova (the brightness of a billion suns) and you were starting right at the point where it supposedly would be, and when its light would reach you, you would not see even a glimmer.

That’s what a typical place looks like in universe. Big cold with nothing happening.

If that’s some design then the designer flunked big time. We are more likely to be living in a discarded dustbin than anything well planned.
Reply
RE: The Watchmaker: my fav argument
(March 9, 2021 at 8:43 pm)John 6IX Breezy Wrote:
(March 9, 2021 at 8:32 pm)SUNGULA Wrote: So there can't be interruptions as everyone is permitted to speak whenever they want. Thus the rules of etiquette on interruptions don't apply here. Oh and you can be interrupted in private. If I yell through your window while you're talking to someone and you get distracted. I have interrupted you.

Hmm that's a good point lol. But Deborah Tannen has a book on discourse in which she studies the conversational styles of men and women (how men interrupt women specifically).

She argues that an interruption requires two things: For one person to start speaking, and the other person to stop. Therefore, if Nudger starts talking and others stop, an interruption has occurred.
I don't agree I think interruption can also be to people talking at the same time ,And the fact one person chooses to end the conversation after another participant (in an open forum) chooses to converse instead is simply the conversation shifting participants within the thread.
"Change was inevitable"


Nemo sicut deus debet esse!

[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]



 “No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM


      
Reply
RE: The Watchmaker: my fav argument
Quote:If that’s some design then the designer flunked big time. 

How do you know what the designer intended?
Reply
RE: The Watchmaker: my fav argument
Quote:How do you know what the designer intended?
Not needed
"Change was inevitable"


Nemo sicut deus debet esse!

[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]



 “No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM


      
Reply
RE: The Watchmaker: my fav argument
The universe is a certain way.
I would have designed it differently.
Therefore it wasn't designed.

I think that's a bad argument.
Reply
RE: The Watchmaker: my fav argument
I observe the universe.
Using a naturalistic model of the universe, I can make accurate predictions about it's behavior and up to a certain point, it's origin.
I can observe the process of evolution.
Using a naturalistic model of evolution, I can make accurate predictions about how life has changed over the billions of years on this planet and up to a certain point it's origins.
Naturalistic models appear to be the most accurate explanation for the universe and life on this planet.
Insanity - Doing the same thing over and over again, expecting a different result
Reply
RE: The Watchmaker: my fav argument
(March 10, 2021 at 6:06 am)Rahn127 Wrote: I observe the universe.
Using a naturalistic model of the universe, I can make accurate predictions about it's behavior and up to a certain point, it's origin.
I can observe the process of evolution.
Using a naturalistic model of evolution, I can make accurate predictions about how life has changed over the billions of years on this planet and up to a certain point it's origins.
Naturalistic models appear to be the most accurate explanation for the universe and life on this planet.

This is a better argument, and a completely different one, from the one I was mocking earlier.
Reply
RE: The Watchmaker: my fav argument
(March 10, 2021 at 4:52 am)Belacqua Wrote: The universe is a certain way.
I would have designed it differently.
Therefore it wasn't designed.

I think that's a bad argument.

No more or less so than it's positive corollary.

The universe is a certain way
I would have designed it this way
Therefore it was designed.

We're either entertaining it, or we aren't.  If we are entertaining it as we are being asked to do, then ofc we can make equivalent claims upon equal footing. If, however, we shouldn't be entertaining this sort of proposition at all because bad argument, ID is bankrupt from the start.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Blind Watchmaker - Preface Daystar 18 7671 December 16, 2008 at 6:15 pm
Last Post: CoxRox



Users browsing this thread: 7 Guest(s)