(October 21, 2021 at 7:24 pm)Irreligious Atheist Wrote:

(October 21, 2021 at 7:07 pm)arewethereyet Wrote: You are a 'little bit gay'?

You straightsplaining to me about my own sexuality?

I'm bisexual. I'd say about 5 percent into males, 95 percent into females. I've never had a sexual experience with a man. I have in my dreams a few times though. Anyways, sexuality is about attraction, and not the sexual acts themselves, so that's kind of irrelevant.

Is there a chart somewhere that outlines 'a little bit gay' to FABULOUS?

It seems we need more categories.

I have a coworker I need to ask but I'm pretty sure he's FABULOUS.

And you are the one who said you are a little bit gay. I was asking for clarification. A chart would be great.

So If I understand you correctly IA, You think it's not good to have unfair advantages in sports, Which tells me you have no idea how sports work.

The NBA, For example, is dominated by 6'6+ people who have a height advantage.

Likes it's literally the basis of professional sports that the top team has people who are more naturally gifted than others.

(October 21, 2021 at 6:55 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote:

Holy shit that picture is funny. I can't stop laughing at it.

Anyway, I don't think the allegations that IR is a blithering idiot are correct. Several of his points have been cogently put, and I appreciate that. That doesn't make his points correct, but it does mean they deserve counterarguments rather than outright dismissal.

I must disagree Vul

(October 21, 2021 at 8:13 pm)vulcanlogician Wrote: Holy shit that picture is funny. I can't stop laughing at it.

Anyway, I don't think the allegations that IR is a blithering idiot are correct. Several of his points have been cogently put, and I appreciate that. That doesn't make his points correct, but it does mean they deserve counterarguments rather than outright dismissal.

I don't have to give him anything. He's a rape apologist, among other disgusting things. As the layers of the onion are peeled away the more rot there is. Being able to put together a sentence doesn't merit giving him a pass.

It's not just stringing a sentence together. It's stringing a complete thought together. Rape apologist? Maybe elsewhere in a thread I've yet to read. But blithering idiot? No. I mean, I just don't see it. Maybe I'm missing something.

To me, there's a difference between dumb and wrong. Much of the time, dumb can't be fixed. But wrong can be.

(October 21, 2021 at 8:09 pm)Nay_Sayer Wrote: So If I understand you correctly IA, You think it's not good to have unfair advantages in sports, Which tells me you have no idea how sports work.

The NBA, For example, is dominated by 6'6+ people who have a height advantage.

Likes it's literally the basis of professional sports that the top team has people who are more naturally gifted than others.

I don't believe we were talking about trans in sports, but I'll bite. There are different leagues and different levels of play for different talent levels. If you're not good enough to play in the NBA, you play in China or Turkey or wherever else. If you're one of the top few hundred players in the world, you are likely going to be playing in the NBA. Some players will be more talented than others in this group of a few hundred guys, and if you don't have people only like 15 percent as good as Lebron James playing in the league with him, you won't have enough players to make up a league of teams. What you are saying is just silly.

Bio men should not compete against bio women because bio men already have their own leagues. If you transition and purposely weaken yourself with hormones, don't complain when you're no longer good enough to compete against the other bio men. You weakened yourself, and you knew you were doing it, and you chose to do it. Bio men playing in women's leagues have the advantage of lung capacity, bigger hands, bone structure, etc.

(October 21, 2021 at 8:35 pm)vulcanlogician Wrote: It's not just stringing a sentence together. It's stringing a complete thought together. Rape apologist? Maybe elsewhere in a thread I've yet to read. But blithering idiot? No. I mean, I just don't see it. Maybe I'm missing something.

To me, there's a difference between dumb and wrong. Much of the time, dumb can't be fixed. But wrong can be.

Rape apologetics go beyond dumb as do some of the other topics he's broached on this forum...not necessarily this thread.

I read his stuff in hopes that a glimmer of a decent person who is trying to be better is revealed...so far, no such luck.

You're still going on about your rape apology claims? Why am I bringing up sexual abuse committed by Catholic priests if I am such a big fan of rape? The evidence overwhelmingly showed that Kobe Bryant was not guilty, and in the absence of evidence, you shouldn't be locking up black men who are overwhelmingly likely to be innocent. There are already far too many of them locked up. By the way, in this post I'm not putting down the accuser at all, so don't ban me again. The accuser is lovely and beautiful and brave.

(October 21, 2021 at 8:49 pm)Irreligious Atheist Wrote: You're still going on about your rape apology claims? Why am I bringing up sexual abuse committed by Catholic priests if I am such a big fan of rape? The evidence overwhelmingly showed that Kobe Bryant was not guilty, and in the absence of evidence, you shouldn't be locking up black men who are overwhelmingly likely to be innocent. There are already far too many of them locked up. By the way, in this post I'm not putting down the accuser at all, so don't ban me again. The accuser is lovely and beautiful and brave.

/sarcasm noted

Thanks for the proof I didn't have to provide to vulcan.