I love how he makes a number of posts repeating the same flawed statements

(5 hours ago)The Architect Of Fate Wrote: I love how he makes a number of posts repeating the same flawed statements

Personally I think the air is starting to go out of this chew toy. There was a time when apologists / trolls had fkn standards, beyond tedious repetition.

(4 hours ago)Sheldon Wrote:

(5 hours ago)The Architect Of Fate Wrote: I love how he makes a number of posts repeating the same flawed statements

Personally I think the air is starting to go out of this chew toy. There was a time when apologists / trolls had fkn standards, beyond tedious repetition.

Facts 

(5 hours ago)AngelThMan Wrote:

(9 hours ago)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Reply #5, Page 1, this thread. I await your apology.

Boru

You didn't answer my follow up question. It takes no brains to say "No, I don't agree." Zero substance. Since you "don't agree," how do you know anything is objective right or wrong or evil? What standard are you using???

This is your last chance to demonstrate any brain cells. I'm not replying to you ever again if you come up with more dodging. Of course I don't expect you to produce any intelligent discourse since you're clearly an uneducated idiot.

I don’t agree because I don’t think there’s any such thing as an objective moral standard.

I didn’t bother answering your follow-up [note correct spelling] because it’s the same question. My answer serves for both.

No one is dodging. You just keep asking the same question over and over, trying to get the answer that will soothe your nerves and cure your erectile dysfunction.

I may be an idiot (opinions vary), but I’m not uneducated.

Boru

(5 hours ago)AngelThMan Wrote:

(11 hours ago)Deesse23 Wrote: You haven't addressed any of my complaints. I wonder why.
You didn't even deny that you tried to slip your Christian god into this from the start  


Did you talk to a Muslim yet about his gods objective morals?
Did you educate yourself about objective morals?
Did you figure that shouting tu quoque or red herring does not magically make your terrible arguments and lies go away?

So much for you to learn, correct or apologize for, but you decided to go for a cheap insult. Do I really look like I am going to be impressed by being insulted by somebody like you?

Is that shitty moral argument all you could come up with after FIFTEEN  years!? Please tell me it ain't so.

You could have introduced yourself, explained what you did in the meantime, tell us about about your journey. You could have told us why you believe in the Christian god, after all what is his enough to convince you could be good enough to convince others. Or was it...some personal experience? Did God help you to find your car keys? It surely  wasn't something like the moral argument that convinced you of Christianity, was it?

But no, you came with blazing guns, a terrible argument and dishonesty, and now wonder about the pushback.

What a role model of a Christian you are.

Because they're all red herring fallacies and I don't have to address them. They're dodging the original premise. Since you don't know logic, ai does. Ask if your method is logically sound. But ask the right way. First post my original post, and then ask if your answer is logically sound.

Ok, you clearly didnt talk to a muslim yet and learned that there are objective morals without your god.
Have you decided yet if you want to kill babies and only your gods objective morals keep you from doing it? Or would it be actually a good thing to do if your god ordered you to do it? Maybe both? I for my part ground my morals on human well being and leave the baby killing dilemma to amoral puppets like you.

For your script: Is it going to be the classic...
Am i a prophet now? 

(1 hour ago)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: I may be an idiot (opinions vary), but I’m not uneducated.
Boru

I can confirm one of those!

(1 hour ago)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:

(5 hours ago)AngelThMan Wrote: You didn't answer my follow up question. It takes no brains to say "No, I don't agree." Zero substance. Since you "don't agree," how do you know anything is objective right or wrong or evil? What standard are you using???

This is your last chance to demonstrate any brain cells. I'm not replying to you ever again if you come up with more dodging. Of course I don't expect you to produce any intelligent discourse since you're clearly an uneducated idiot.

I don’t agree because I don’t think there’s any such thing as an objective moral standard.

I didn’t bother answering your follow-up [note correct spelling] because it’s the same question. My answer serves for both.

No one is dodging. You just keep asking the same question over and over, trying to get the answer that will soothe your nerves and cure your erectile dysfunction.

I may be an idiot (opinions vary), but I’m not uneducated.

Boru

Fine. You don't believe in objective morality. So then it follows nothing is objectively right or wrong? Correct?

Nowhere did he say that .....lol

(1 hour ago)Deesse23 Wrote:

(5 hours ago)AngelThMan Wrote: Because they're all red herring fallacies and I don't have to address them. They're dodging the original premise. Since you don't know logic, ai does. Ask if your method is logically sound. But ask the right way. First post my original post, and then ask if your answer is logically sound.

I for my part ground my morals on human well being 

This is the only thing you said that's not a red herring and that's relevant to the topic I brought up.

What if some group doesn't care about human well-being? They believe humans are awful and want to destroy them all except themselves so they can let animals rule. Are they required by some universal law to check with you first to see if it's right or wrong? Should they care about what anyone outside their group thinks? What law of the universe are they breaking?

(1 hour ago)AngelThMan Wrote:

(1 hour ago)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: I don’t agree because I don’t think there’s any such thing as an objective moral standard.

I didn’t bother answering your follow-up [note correct spelling] because it’s the same question. My answer serves for both.

No one is dodging. You just keep asking the same question over and over, trying to get the answer that will soothe your nerves and cure your erectile dysfunction.

I may be an idiot (opinions vary), but I’m not uneducated.

Boru

Fine. You don't believe in objective morality. So then it follows nothing is objectively right or wrong? Correct?

Correct.

Boru