That's not what "schizoid" is.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schizoid_pe...y_disorder

(September 26, 2012 at 12:35 pm)Annik Wrote: That's not what "schizoid" is.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schizoid_pe...y_disorder

My bad. I thought it was derived from schism, as in, a split. It apparently doesn't mean that, just like anti-social doesn't mean someone who is against being social. It confused me. I didn't mean to suggest that he has a genuine personality disorder, but that he does go from one extreme to the next sometimes.
EDIT: Nope, none taken.

There are a lot of misconceptions about a large number of personality disorders, I just like to dispel them to the best of my ability. I hope you didn't take it in offense. It doesn't seem that you have. Here, here is a funny picture for you:

(September 26, 2012 at 12:38 am)Blackrook Wrote:

(September 26, 2012 at 12:31 am)The_Germans_are_coming Wrote: i started reading your posts because i thought, maybe your right, maybe you are being insulted without a reason, and i am the kind of person who checkes things before making a judgement.
i came to the conclusion that you start everything by insulting, and if not insulting liying.

as soon as i have figured out how, i will file a complaint

Anyway, you do that.

And if I get banned from this forum I win because I will have proven that atheists can't take the same kind of heat that they bring when they go into Christian forums and knock over the furniture and break all the china.

The only thing you will have succeeded in doing is adhering to the stereotype of the religious fanatic; that you are sad, lonely and somewhat deluded creature.
You are nothing special, there have been many like you and there will be many more as the human race is varied and produces many sorry mistakes.
You will merge with those mistakes, your name will evade recollection, you will be forgotten.

Deal with it.

(September 26, 2012 at 12:41 am)Blackrook Wrote: Am I held to a higher standard because I'm a Christian?

Yeah, sure, why not... anything to feed your interminably dull martyr fap fantasy. Happy now?

(September 26, 2012 at 11:46 am)CapnAwesome Wrote: I'm kind of surprised that nobody has stated the obvious, which is the what he is saying is NOT TRUE to start with. Atheists weren't responsible for the reign of terror. In fact the very thing he links only makes one reference to atheism as part of a very small anti-clerical campaign. Robespierre himself was opposed to Atheism, called it one of three evils in the world, executed Atheists during the reign of terror. Initiated the worship of a supreme being and had blood filled festivals to him. In fact both of the starters of the Atheist movement during the french revolution were promptly executed.

Somehow though this gets blamed on Atheism? Maybe you should do a little more reading.

I think this needs to be highlighted again so the bigoted Blackrook will acknowledge his error.

Yeah, like Blackrook is intellectually honest enough to admit he was in error...

(September 26, 2012 at 1:03 pm)Simon Moon Wrote:

(September 26, 2012 at 11:46 am)CapnAwesome Wrote: I'm kind of surprised that nobody has stated the obvious, which is the what he is saying is NOT TRUE to start with. Atheists weren't responsible for the reign of terror. In fact the very thing he links only makes one reference to atheism as part of a very small anti-clerical campaign. Robespierre himself was opposed to Atheism, called it one of three evils in the world, executed Atheists during the reign of terror. Initiated the worship of a supreme being and had blood filled festivals to him. In fact both of the starters of the Atheist movement during the french revolution were promptly executed.

Somehow though this gets blamed on Atheism? Maybe you should do a little more reading.

I think this needs to be highlighted again so the bigoted Blackrook will acknowledge his error.

Yeah, like Blackrook is intellectually honest enough to admit he was in error...

Yeah, but in his deluded little brain, anytime anyone does or says anything that hurts the feelings of the Catholic church it's automatically evil atheists. I'm waiting for him to tell us atheists were responsible for those priests raping children.

(September 26, 2012 at 12:41 am)Blackrook Wrote: Don't get me started on Germans, you really shouldn't.

I mean don't.

I mean, really, you don't want to get me started on Germans.

You sound like a Kardashian. Come on, buddy.

(September 26, 2012 at 12:51 am)Blackrook Wrote: All I said is that I think the Germans were to blame for it.

Is that a lie?

The sword of generalisation cuts both ways, Catholic. Raped a child recently?

Quote:Maybe you should do a little more reading.

Why start now? This isn't about facts. It's about fantasies implanted in his little catholic mind.

I'll bet the priests had fun passing his sorry little ass around.

(September 26, 2012 at 11:46 am)CapnAwesome Wrote: I'm kind of surprised that nobody has stated the obvious, which is the what he is saying is NOT TRUE to start with. Atheists weren't responsible for the reign of terror. In fact the very thing he links only makes one reference to atheism as part of a very small anti-clerical campaign. Robespierre himself was opposed to Atheism, called it one of three evils in the world, executed Atheists during the reign of terror. Initiated the worship of a supreme being and had blood filled festivals to him. In fact both of the starters of the Atheist movement during the french revolution were promptly executed.

Somehow though this gets blamed on Atheism? Maybe you should do a little more reading.

Well, its nice to see that at least one person responded to what I posted instead of insulting me and whining about how mean I am being to atheists.

I will look into this information and get back to you.