http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/10/3...r-charges/

I love the part where he says he's a member of the Delaware Family Policy Council. Aparently, they have a problem with two openly gay consenting adults having sex with each other, but if a guy diddles little boys in secret, that's all good.
At least this guy had the sense to drop out of his race before being indited. Still, I can't help but think, had he not dropped out, we'd probably hear Faux News defending him.

Defend him? They'd probably demand that the pope make him a fucking saint.

(November 1, 2012 at 2:00 am)Minimalist Wrote: Defend him? They'd probably demand that the pope make him a fucking saint.

.. or at least put him into their perp-protection program.

No doubt he was framed by the liberal media. Or something.

(November 1, 2012 at 1:50 am)TaraJo Wrote: http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/10/3...r-charges/

I couldn't get the link to open. What's the candidates name?

It took awhile for it to open for me too. The guy's name is Eric Bodenweiser. Here's the charges:

Quote:The indictment includes 113 felony sex charges, including 39 counts of unlawful sexual intercourse — first-degree and 74 counts of unlawful sexual contact — second-degree.

Why is it always the "Family" guys? I think these "pro-family" organizations are really just hangouts for those who repress their sexuality.

(November 1, 2012 at 1:50 am)TaraJo Wrote: we'd probably hear Faux News defending him.

I dont think anyone would actualy have the lack of common sence, or is that much not integrated into his or her sociaty that he or she would defend a man who raped a child.
Sure some people are so corrupted that they would defend individuals representing their own political position, despite of whatever crime was comited by that individual.

But child rape? That "journalist" or mouthpiece would disapear out of the puplic`s field of view.

You might find fucktards in Saudi Arabia or the Taliban defending that guy, after all the age of concent is 12 in Saudi Arabia and the Taliban are just a tribe of pedophiles.

Well, he's been a busy little bugger, hasn't he.


"No Democrats were harmed during the making of this story."

(November 1, 2012 at 8:11 am)The_Germans_are_coming Wrote:

(November 1, 2012 at 1:50 am)TaraJo Wrote: we'd probably hear Faux News defending him.

I dont think anyone would actualy have the lack of common sence, or is that much not integrated into his or her sociaty that he or she would defend a man who raped a child.
Sure some people are so corrupted that they would defend individuals representing their own political position, despite of whatever crime was comited by that individual.

But child rape? That "journalist" or mouthpiece would disapear out of the puplic`s field of view.

You might find fucktards in Saudi Arabia or the Taliban defending that guy, after all the age of concent is 12 in Saudi Arabia and the Taliban are just a tribe of pedophiles.

You've underestimated Fox News. In their eyes, a Republican can do no wrong (and if he does, it's a democrats fault) and a Democrat can do no right (but if he does, it was because a Republican helped him). And, yes, they don't hesitate to compare us to countries like Saudi Arabia when it suits their agenda; I've lost count the number of times they compared us to 'the terrorists' when it was disovered we were torturing prisoners.

Well liberals ARE out to destroy America and bring about a socialistic dystopia right?