RE: Would you rather live under an oppressive religious or securlar government?
January 18, 2013 at 3:41 pm
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 8, 2024, 4:40 am
Thread Rating:
Would you rather live under an oppressive religious or securlar government?
|
RE: Would you rather live under an oppressive religious or securlar government?
January 18, 2013 at 3:59 pm
(This post was last modified: January 18, 2013 at 4:06 pm by HorribleOffensiveScouser91.)
(January 17, 2013 at 11:33 pm)Polaris Wrote: I have two different answers depending on if I were Christian or not. You've used this as a way to argue that religion is good. However, when your only way of making religion look good is comparing it to a secular government it really shows even you see it's corruption. Furthermore, by making this argument you are basically saying 'religion is repressive, but at least it gives you the freedom to think what you like' which really baffles me. (January 18, 2013 at 3:59 pm)HorribleOffensiveScouser91 Wrote:(January 17, 2013 at 11:33 pm)Polaris Wrote: I have two different answers depending on if I were Christian or not. Also, you've stated in your argument that religion has caused the deaths of a few but that secular government causes so much more death. That is no way to justify it, it doesn't matter the amount of deaths that have occured, one death caused is equally as bad. It's like me saying Hitler was good because Stalin killed millions more, well, both were still awful. RE: Would you rather live under an oppressive religious or securlar government?
January 18, 2013 at 4:26 pm
I don't think I'd give a shit either way. Whether a government oppresses it's citizens for secular or religious reasons it isn't the reasons -but the oppression- that makes it a hellhole.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
RE: Would you rather live under an oppressive religious or securlar government?
January 20, 2013 at 8:29 pm
(This post was last modified: January 20, 2013 at 8:29 pm by RonaldReagansGhost666.)
(January 17, 2013 at 11:33 pm)Polaris Wrote: With secular governments, they have resorted to wiping out whole villages in their nations to achieve the same level of fear and control...Saddam Huesan resorted to measures such as that and he was Muslim. As with people such as Stalin, Pol Pot, and Kim Jong Il; they had only taken god out of their countries because they wanted to replace him. RE: Would you rather live under an oppressive religious or securlar government?
January 20, 2013 at 8:32 pm
Quote:With secular governments, they have resorted to wiping out whole villages in their nations to achieve the same level of fear and control... Child's play compared to you fucking jesus freaks. http://home.olympus.net/~thomson/cathar.html Quote:The Cathar population of France was largely rural and was completely suppressed by the end of the 13th century at the cost of about a million innocent lives. RE: Would you rather live under an oppressive religious or securlar government?
January 20, 2013 at 9:35 pm
(January 18, 2013 at 3:41 pm)Minimalist Wrote: It was suspected but around here when Shel calls someone an idiot it is like the Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval. From now on it is official. I bet if we ask nicely we could have an official shiny badge made for it.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
RE: Would you rather live under an oppressive religious or securlar government?
January 20, 2013 at 9:54 pm
RE: Would you rather live under an oppressive religious or securlar government?
January 20, 2013 at 10:11 pm
That's the idea - a picture of Shell in the middle and I think we'll really have something!
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
RE: Would you rather live under an oppressive religious or securlar government?
January 20, 2013 at 11:47 pm
RE: Would you rather live under an oppressive religious or securlar government?
January 21, 2013 at 2:21 pm
(This post was last modified: January 21, 2013 at 2:22 pm by Fidel_Castronaut.)
(January 20, 2013 at 8:29 pm)C3P0 Wrote:(January 17, 2013 at 11:33 pm)Polaris Wrote: With secular governments, they have resorted to wiping out whole villages in their nations to achieve the same level of fear and control...Saddam Huesan resorted to measures such as that and he was Muslim. To be fair, SH's government was actually secular, especially in comparison to most other states in the Middle East (he had Coptic Christian cabinet ministers for example). But the entire thing is irrelevant anyway. A secular government does not mean "oppression" or "murder" in the way Polaris appears to think it does. It's just a methodology for enacting state affairs. Statistically, a secular government is far less likely to result in a horrible totalitarian regime than a non-secular one because at it's root is a basis in fairness and equality (SEE: Westphalian synthesis, 1648). It is the people who operate within that regime that cause the trouble, and certain governmental philosophies (Dictatorship, Theocracy) are more likely to spawn terrible regimes than others. Love atheistforums.org? Consider becoming a patreon and helping towards our server costs.
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)