There's no lack of love. I'm genuinely concerned that you might need professional help, but refuse to because you're stubborn. If you are right and nothing is wrong with you, then awesome, carry on. But if I'm right, please, get some help!

(March 22, 2013 at 4:25 pm)jstrodel Wrote: God cannot be understood by the mean spirited.

Without having read the bulk of this thread, it seems that once again we have dissolved into:

1) Revealing that believers (theists or not) really only care that no one hurts their feelings about their sacred cow - they don't give a shit about whether they're actually right or not.

2) Exposing a personality problem in people who feel the need to go onto forums of opposite minded people and try to "prove" those people are wrong (delusions of grandeur again and again)

3) This forum loves picking at Poes.

@jstrodel

You sit so well in that high horse of yours that you cannot see what innane drivels you have wrote in this forum. Bluntly, all that you have done is the proverbial pull of shit out of your ass. Bare naked assertions and deluded ideas.

(March 22, 2013 at 4:21 pm)jstrodel Wrote: No, you posted a description of schizophrenia, and you refused to deal with the fallacy in your "diagnosis" of my spiritual experience as schizophrenia based on the fact that what you are trying to prove is true.

Without evidence, again. Without justifying the connection. Again.

You are making fun of my name, calling mentally ill people cukkoo and slandering me. And you will not provide any evidence that I am schizophrenic, but you seem to label all religious people with specific, medical terminology that is intentionally designed to undermine their beliefs.

These are self evident statements about your character.

First of all, if you are going to quote me, quote what I said, not your own inane drivel with my name attached to it.

It was Kayennah who used the word cuckoo, not me. I simply responded to your comments on the use of the word. I make fun of your name because I can. If you would like to tease me for my name, go right ahead. I outgrew fear of teasing when i was in second grade.

Please show me anywhere that I have labeled all (or any, for that matter) religious people with any kind of medical terminology, specific or otherwise. And what is different about me undermining the beliefs of theists when your agenda is to undermine the non-belief of atheists? Isn't that a bit of a pot/kettle situation?

You mean it is evident that I point out willful ignorance, have a sense of humor and little tolerance for arrogant, holier-than-thou asswipes that get butthurt cause somebody made fun of his name? Is that the character you are talking about?

Quote:"Normal" people do not talk to god, lay in their giant sky filled with spirit beds and have god tell them they are his little spirit friends.

You are labeling religious experience as being tied to psychological problems.

You still refuse to provide evidence that demonization is identical to schizophrenia.

Maybe it's an entirely new kind of crazy that psychology won't touch until you're too few in number to constitute a threat. But, it could very well be just random brain glitches like everyone has, and religious idiots make mountains out of those molehills.

(March 22, 2013 at 4:40 pm)thesummerqueen Wrote: ...believers (theists or not) really only care that no one hurts their feelings about their sacred cow - they don't give a shit about whether they're actually right or not.

Some people just get my goat.

I think about theological and apologetic issues 5 or 6 hours a day or more. I care deeply whether I am right.

(March 24, 2013 at 12:21 am)jstrodel Wrote: I care deeply whether I am right.

It must, therefore, take a very thick theological bubble to remain thinking you are correct.