Is water still a miracle found nowhere else in the universe, Ronny?

(August 23, 2013 at 12:10 pm)Esquilax Wrote: Is water still a miracle found nowhere else in the universe, Ronny?

Honestly? I dunno. I'm not an astrophyicist. And the earth is the only place that I've been in the universe... But, I'm sure we could find a subject I know quite a bit more about.

And we, or most of us say things from time to time that are: off subject, emotional, unintentional, away from our knowledge base, or outright dumb.

But, I own anything I say. You won't see me back peddle or deny it. I can laugh just as well at myself, as you can... maybe more!

So, if you want to base my whole existence on this good for you. I hope to entertain you again at some point in the future.

Quote: But, I'm sure we could find a subject I know quite a bit more about.

We should start a pool on that comment.

(August 23, 2013 at 12:40 pm)Minimalist Wrote:

Quote: But, I'm sure we could find a subject I know quite a bit more about.

We should start a pool on that comment.

How bout criminal law? I could cite [you] for multipule violations in one day...uh...hour here!

(August 23, 2013 at 12:54 pm)ronedee Wrote: How bout criminal law? I could cite [you] for multipule violations in one day...uh...hour here!

I didn't realise criminals had laws, how do they differ from our regular laws?

(August 23, 2013 at 2:47 pm)Rationalman Wrote:

(August 23, 2013 at 12:54 pm)ronedee Wrote: How bout criminal law? I could cite [you] for multipule violations in one day...uh...hour here!

I didn't realise criminals had laws, how do they differ from our regular laws?

veeeeeeeerrrrrrrrrrrrrry different! The sentences are a lot longer!

(August 23, 2013 at 1:20 am)ronedee Wrote:

(August 22, 2013 at 11:36 pm)Ryantology Wrote: I have an image of you as a blind, irrational, stupid, barely coherent and hateful asshole, thanks to your words and your behavior demonstrating that you are all of these things.

Well then, you would be a "liar"..... But, I'd take all the above over that one word.

How do you conclude that someone's impression of you is a lie? Do you think that Ryantology secretly thinks your posts reflect well on you and just won't admit it?

---

(August 23, 2013 at 12:36 pm)ronedee Wrote:

(August 23, 2013 at 12:10 pm)Esquilax Wrote: Is water still a miracle found nowhere else in the universe, Ronny?

Honestly? I dunno. I'm not an astrophyicist. And the earth is the only place that I've been in the universe... But, I'm sure we could find a subject I know quite a bit more about.

Maybe you should stick to what you know.

(August 23, 2013 at 12:36 pm)ronedee Wrote: And we, or most of us say things from time to time that are: off subject, emotional, unintentional, away from our knowledge base, or outright dumb.

Are you saying it's unjust to conclude someone is lying just because you think they are wrong? So soon after calling Ryantology a liar for what he thinks of you?

(August 23, 2013 at 12:36 pm)ronedee Wrote: But, I own anything I say. You won't see me back peddle or deny it. I can laugh just as well at myself, as you can... maybe more!

I'm going to cut you some slack and instead of concluding that you're lying about this, I'm going to go with: so amazingly lacking in self-awareness that you can't even remember being called out for doing exactly that in this very thread when you began with an insinuation about atheists and back-pedaled with a claim that you were only asking questions...and then couldn't help repeating your original insinuation and saying it was the point you were trying to make all along.

It's good to be able to laugh at yourself. It's better to know when you should laugh at yourself, and about what.

(August 23, 2013 at 12:36 pm)ronedee Wrote: So, if you want to base my whole existence on this good for you. I hope to entertain you again at some point in the future.

The most generous interpretation I can make of the problem you're having with us is that you are so focused on contradicting us that you're not even noticing when you're being inconsistent, and you have a problem gracefully admitting it when you make a mistake. Also, you have a tendency to manage to insult all of us when you're mad at one of is, leading everyone to jump on you. Calming down and thinking a bit more before you post should help with this.

---

(August 23, 2013 at 12:54 pm)ronedee Wrote:

(August 23, 2013 at 12:40 pm)Minimalist Wrote: We should start a pool on that comment.

How bout criminal law? I could cite [you] for multipule violations in one day...uh...hour here!

OK. Maybe next time you're looking for an analogy, you can base it on your knowledge of criminal law.

(August 23, 2013 at 4:28 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote: How do you conclude that someone's impression of you is a lie? Do you think that Ryantology secretly thinks your posts reflect well on you and just won't admit it?

Did you read the things he called me? NOT true = lies.

(August 23, 2013 at 4:28 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote: Maybe you should stick to what you know.

I try. But part of the method of debating is to take one out of their comfort zone. And [in the past] due to my temper I've been a willing passenger.

(August 23, 2013 at 4:28 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote: Are you saying it's unjust to conclude someone is lying just because you think they are wrong? So soon after calling Ryantology a liar for what he thinks of you?

I'm not sure why you are answering for Ryan, but he doesn't know me, neither do you. If someone that knows me looked at his quote they most certainly would call him a "liar".

Whatever is in his mind [about me] should stay there... I'm not interested.

(August 23, 2013 at 4:28 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote: I'm going to cut you some slack and instead of concluding that you're lying about this, I'm going to go with: so amazingly lacking in self-awareness that you can't even remember being called out for doing exactly that in this very thread when you began with an insinuation about atheists and back-pedaled with a claim that you were only asking questions...and then couldn't help repeating your original insinuation and saying it was the point you were trying to make all along.

I'm glad you are willing to give me something!

Why would I ask "only" questions? Whats the point? It's like saying: "I'm [only] talking."

I said that I was asking these questions because I wanted to know the "minds, motives and reasons for the way atheists think". That's a pretty broad question! And, I found out a lot! "Ulterior motives" are usually, something unrelated to the actual subject at hand?

My error may have been I stating the obvious results in a negative way! But I was being shit-up-on! So, all bets are off in a heated battle... because I may want to hurt back!

(August 23, 2013 at 4:28 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote: The most generous interpretation I can make of the problem you're having with us is that you are so focused on contradicting us that you're not even noticing when you're being inconsistent, and you have a problem gracefully admitting it when you make a mistake. Also, you have a tendency to manage to insult all of us when you're mad at one of is, leading everyone to jump on you. Calming down and thinking a bit more before you post should help with this.

Thanks again for going easy on me!

Not to repeat myself over and over... But I have seen the light! Most of your observations are correct.

[I'm trying] to temper my responses. Mainly to get my message across accurately. Secondly, to not get overheated because of darts being thrown at me from all directions. That's where I lose it... in my message and consistency.

(August 23, 2013 at 12:40 pm)Minimalist Wrote:

Quote: But, I'm sure we could find a subject I know quite a bit more about.

We should start a pool on that comment.

If it is a pool of water, she would assert it to be a miracle, then admit Christianity does not equip her to say, but said it anyway. Which is okay for her, but would be deemed a crime if done by someone else, because she knows criminal law, which is a lie, but it's okay because she is christain, and essence of Christianity is to deem a monstrous lie the most supreme and ineffable truth, and the pile lie upon lie to defend the shabby tale at its origin.

(August 24, 2013 at 11:01 pm)ronedee Wrote: I'm not sure why you are answering for Ryan, but he doesn't know me, neither do you. If someone that knows me looked at his quote they most certainly would call him a "liar".

Whatever is in his mind [about me] should stay there... I'm not interested.

I only know you within the context of your behavior here on AF, a tapestry of elaborate lunacy telling the story of a person who is unpleasant, irrational, superstitious, and highly prone to saying extremely stupid things. I have no way of knowing how much your meatspace persona reflects your online persona, but I hope for your sake they don't resemble each other.