If I have sufficient valid evidence to back up my claims then it wouldn't be bollocks now would it?

Theology doesn't have valid evidence as far as I know... which is why I believe it is almost certainly bollocks, and will continue to believe so until I know of any valid evidence.

EvF

To make it work you'd have to exclude a hell of a lot, hence the bollocks.

Theology intrinsically doesn't have validated evidence. This must come as quite a shock. Like black not being white, heat not being cold... it must be a struggle for you to understand these apparent contradictions.

Considering it doesn't have any valid evidence, this means it cannot claim any knowledge or understanding at all rationally.

I said that if "evidenceology" had valid evidence to support its claims, then it wouldn't be bollocks, no. Just how any belief that has supporting valid evidence is rational.

EvF

Yet it does

Tired with the other roundabout.

How is belief without evidence rational?

EvF

Theology is not a REAL subject.

That is the view that I (almost) certainly hold as well.

EvF

(February 8, 2010 at 6:56 pm)Minimalist Wrote:

Quote:It's a shame a handful of atheists make the rest look bad.

Fuck you and your fucking fairy tales. If you want respect for them, go a xtian board.

Do you realize that God is angry with those who cuss Christians, and those who do so will have to answer for it at the Judgment?

SEE: http://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]@N22

(March 10, 2010 at 12:52 pm)Gilligan Wrote:

(February 8, 2010 at 6:56 pm)Minimalist Wrote:

Quote:It's a shame a handful of atheists make the rest look bad.

Fuck you and your fucking fairy tales. If you want respect for them, go a xtian board.

Do you realize that God is angry with those who cuss Christians, and those who do so will have to answer for it at the Judgment?

SEE: http://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]@N22

Oh boy. I'm guessing you're joking.

No, I'm not joking. This is very serious.