Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 5, 2024, 2:22 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
what is our stance on global warming?
#41
RE: what is our stance on global warming?
This Earth will take care of itself. We are its creation, and it will deal with us as is necessary.
Reply
#42
RE: what is our stance on global warming?
(August 31, 2014 at 2:16 pm)paulpablo Wrote: I think world wide people should kill all domestic dogs,
Not that I'm a dog lover, but why? What do dogs have to do with global warming?

(August 31, 2014 at 2:16 pm)paulpablo Wrote: cease production of beef, kill the cows.
Good idea!
Everyone, from now on, drink sheep, goat or soy milk. None other! None other is available.
Reply
#43
RE: what is our stance on global warming?
(August 31, 2014 at 5:21 pm)pocaracas Wrote:
(August 31, 2014 at 2:16 pm)paulpablo Wrote: I think world wide people should kill all domestic dogs,
Not that I'm a dog lover, but why? What do dogs have to do with global warming?

(August 31, 2014 at 2:16 pm)paulpablo Wrote: cease production of beef, kill the cows.
Good idea!
Everyone, from now on, drink sheep, goat or soy milk. None other! None other is available.

A dogs carbon footprint is quite large, they consume a lot of meat which requires land which could be used to plant trees.
Cow milk isn't essential for humans so it's no loss.


Are you ready for the fire? We are firemen. WE ARE FIREMEN! The heat doesn’t bother us. We live in the heat. We train in the heat. It tells us that we’re ready, we’re at home, we’re where we’re supposed to be. Flames don’t intimidate us. What do we do? We control the flame. We control them. We move the flames where we want to. And then we extinguish them.

Impersonation is treason.





Reply
#44
RE: what is our stance on global warming?
dbp, let me make some alterations to your statements...
  • I agree we are doing some harm, but we still have to except what climate we are given get from the earth, if we weren't here, I still believe that the climate will still change

    This is true to a very small some extent.

    That it would change anyway is not a perfectly valid reason to not do anything.
(August 31, 2014 at 5:21 pm)pocaracas Wrote: Not that I'm a dog lover, but why? What do dogs have to do with global warming?
Removing one unnecessary pet dog reduces your carbon-footprint by the same amount as removing not one, but two 4WD (SUV) vehicles (link).

There are an estimated 4.2 million pet dogs in Australia, removing all of them would be the same, ecologically speaking, as removing 8.4 million 4WD's (or even more smaller cars). As the population of Australia is 23.5 million, so you can see that just by killing all pet dogs and replacing them with 4WD's the world would be a much better place.

(August 31, 2014 at 10:34 pm)paulpablo Wrote: Cow milk isn't essential for humans so it's no loss.
That's not 100% true. Milk is very nutrient-dense and helps balance diets that are high in grain which is very cheap nutrient-poor food. If we had no dairy we'd need to lessen our dependence on grain, or consume more meat to get our dietary requirements.
For Religion & Health see:[/b][/size] Williams & Sternthal. (2007). Spirituality, religion and health: Evidence and research directions. Med. J. Aust., 186(10), S47-S50. -LINK

The WIN/Gallup End of Year Survey 2013 found the US was perceived to be the greatest threat to world peace by a huge margin, with 24% of respondents fearful of the US followed by: 8% for Pakistan, and 6% for China. This was followed by 5% each for: Afghanistan, Iran, Israel, North Korea. -LINK


"That's disgusting. There were clean athletes out there that have had their whole careers ruined by people like Lance Armstrong who just bended thoughts to fit their circumstances. He didn't look up cheating because he wanted to stop, he wanted to justify what he was doing and to keep that continuing on." - Nicole Cooke
Reply
#45
RE: what is our stance on global warming?
(August 29, 2014 at 4:03 pm)Losty Wrote: OP didn't you post that thread that was like, would life be so much better if we all died? Or something like that. Have you ever considered talking to a family member, close friend, or counselor about your depression?

[Image: 889139-judge_death_18.jpg]

Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni:

"You did WHAT?  With WHO?  WHERE???"
Reply
#46
RE: what is our stance on global warming?
(August 31, 2014 at 2:16 pm)paulpablo Wrote: I think world wide people should kill all domestic dogs, cease production of beef, kill the cows. Use the land what was used for cows to plant trees, and find alternative fuel for vehicles and to produce electricity . That's if people are really worried about global warming. It probably won't effect me in my lifetime and no one else seems to care.
I'm pissed off that I found out that for some reason climate change means britain will get even colder, even as we're being flooded by global warming, I thought I'd at least be able to get a good tan while I'm dying but apparently not.

Dogs? Why that's hardly a drop in the bucket. Anyone at all serious about addressing global warming should advocate harvesting at least two out of every three children. Turn them into to Soylent Green as a protein substitute for cows which would no longer exist.
Reply
#47
RE: what is our stance on global warming?
(August 31, 2014 at 11:46 pm)Aractus Wrote: dbp, let me make some alterations to your statements...
  • I agree we are doing some harm, but we still have to except what climate we are given get from the earth, if we weren't here, I still believe that the climate will still change

    This is true to a very small some extent.

    That it would change anyway is not a perfectly valid reason to not do anything.
(August 31, 2014 at 5:21 pm)pocaracas Wrote: Not that I'm a dog lover, but why? What do dogs have to do with global warming?
Removing one unnecessary pet dog reduces your carbon-footprint by the same amount as removing not one, but two 4WD (SUV) vehicles (link).

There are an estimated 4.2 million pet dogs in Australia, removing all of them would be the same, ecologically speaking, as removing 8.4 million 4WD's (or even more smaller cars). As the population of Australia is 23.5 million, so you can see that just by killing all pet dogs and replacing them with 4WD's the world would be a much better place.

(August 31, 2014 at 10:34 pm)paulpablo Wrote: Cow milk isn't essential for humans so it's no loss.
That's not 100% true. Milk is very nutrient-dense and helps balance diets that are high in grain which is very cheap nutrient-poor food. If we had no dairy we'd need to lessen our dependence on grain, or consume more meat to get our dietary requirements.

Wow. You would see an avoidable mass extinction just because you can't be bothered to make any changes to your life style.

You seemed to have jumped on the "climate will change anyway" part of my post and missed out the part where we are the drivers of cataclysmic change because of the gross miss use of the planet.
If we were to try and purposely fuck the planet up we would be doing exactly the same as we are doing now.



You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.

Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.




 








Reply
#48
RE: what is our stance on global warming?
(September 1, 2014 at 12:51 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote:
(August 31, 2014 at 11:46 pm)Aractus Wrote: dbp, let me make some alterations to your statements...
  • I agree we are doing some harm, but we still have to except what climate we are given get from the earth, if we weren't here, I still believe that the climate will still change

    This is true to a very small some extent.

    That it would change anyway is not a perfectly valid reason to not do anything.
Removing one unnecessary pet dog reduces your carbon-footprint by the same amount as removing not one, but two 4WD (SUV) vehicles (link).

There are an estimated 4.2 million pet dogs in Australia, removing all of them would be the same, ecologically speaking, as removing 8.4 million 4WD's (or even more smaller cars). As the population of Australia is 23.5 million, so you can see that just by killing all pet dogs and replacing them with 4WD's the world would be a much better place.

That's not 100% true. Milk is very nutrient-dense and helps balance diets that are high in grain which is very cheap nutrient-poor food. If we had no dairy we'd need to lessen our dependence on grain, or consume more meat to get our dietary requirements.

Wow. You would see an avoidable mass extinction just because you can't be bothered to make any changes to your life style.

You seemed to have jumped on the "climate will change anyway" part of my post and missed out the part where we are the drivers of cataclysmic change because of the gross miss use of the planet.
If we were to try and purposely fuck the planet up we would be doing exactly the same as we are doing now.

Dogs and cows are an accessory to our human lifestyles, not mine personally because I don't have a pet or eat beef. Many of the dog breeds and cow breeds exist specifically for human needs.
It's more realistic to kill cows and dogs than to tell people they can't drive vehicles anymore.


Are you ready for the fire? We are firemen. WE ARE FIREMEN! The heat doesn’t bother us. We live in the heat. We train in the heat. It tells us that we’re ready, we’re at home, we’re where we’re supposed to be. Flames don’t intimidate us. What do we do? We control the flame. We control them. We move the flames where we want to. And then we extinguish them.

Impersonation is treason.





Reply
#49
RE: what is our stance on global warming?
(September 1, 2014 at 11:49 am)whateverist Wrote:
(August 31, 2014 at 2:16 pm)paulpablo Wrote: I think world wide people should kill all domestic dogs, cease production of beef, kill the cows. Use the land what was used for cows to plant trees, and find alternative fuel for vehicles and to produce electricity . That's if people are really worried about global warming. It probably won't effect me in my lifetime and no one else seems to care.
I'm pissed off that I found out that for some reason climate change means britain will get even colder, even as we're being flooded by global warming, I thought I'd at least be able to get a good tan while I'm dying but apparently not.

Dogs? Why that's hardly a drop in the bucket. Anyone at all serious about addressing global warming should advocate harvesting at least two out of every three children. Turn them into to Soylent Green as a protein substitute for cows which would no longer exist.

We should probably start with Australians before we switch over to children. There probably about enough people there to last long enough to figure out the manufacturing process and get the stuff at least half ass palatable before we start harvesting the more premium younger cuts.
Save a life. Adopt a greyhound.
[Image: JUkLw58.gif]
Reply
#50
RE: what is our stance on global warming?
I would sooner kill environmentalists than my dog.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Good Faith Media: Global Christian Population to reach 3.3 BN by 2050. Nishant Xavier 270 20766 September 30, 2023 at 10:49 am
Last Post: LinuxGal
  What is your stance on magic fellow atheists ? tahaadi 42 6048 October 13, 2018 at 9:51 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  Trump solidified Christian stance with prolife; why he'd make a horrible president. bussta33 12 3212 April 3, 2016 at 5:16 pm
Last Post: Losty
  My stance on religion dyresand 0 617 November 16, 2015 at 11:01 pm
Last Post: dyresand
  Being an atheist is not passive, it requires an active stance Dystopia 33 9716 May 27, 2015 at 9:22 am
Last Post: comet
  Global religion datasets - for research... and interest ManMachine 3 1390 January 7, 2015 at 4:08 am
Last Post: robvalue
  Your stance on Hard Atheism trmof 251 51840 December 18, 2014 at 11:02 pm
Last Post: Whateverist
  Why Agnostic Atheism may not be the most logical stance. Mystic 36 14246 March 1, 2014 at 10:50 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  what is our stance on holistic medicine? leodeo 41 11333 November 9, 2013 at 10:00 pm
Last Post: festive1
Star Plans In Achieving Global Atheism! All Knowing Hippie 24 9461 August 4, 2012 at 9:09 pm
Last Post: Oldandeasilyconfused



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)