Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 25, 2024, 11:28 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Ad Neuseum)
#21
RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Ad Neuseum)
Theists reasoning why god exists and their proof

[Image: page-loader.gif]
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today. 


Code:
<iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&amp;auto_play=false&amp;hide_related=false&amp;show_comments=true&amp;show_user=true&amp;show_reposts=false&amp;visual=true"></iframe>
Reply
#22
RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Ad Neuseum)
A waited a solid 5 seconds before I got it.
I can't remember where this verse is from, I think it got removed from canon:

"I don't hang around with mostly men because I'm gay. It's because men are better than women. Better trained, better equipped...better. Just better! I'm not gay."

For context, this is the previous verse:

"Hi Jesus" -robvalue
Reply
#23
RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Ad Neuseum)
Ahhhhh! I got suckered too Smile Took me about 8 seconds. Nice!

Holy shit, utterly brilliantly amazing video series. Pure genius, and anyone who thinks they can refute this is a gibbering idiot of the highest order.

Whoever that guy is, he is brilliant. But what is a Dieist Paladain? Is it a paladin who dies more than other paladins?
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
#24
RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Ad Neuseum)
Worse than the ad-hoc hypotheses are the ad-hoc statements. They miss out the maybe, and just assert that some ridiculous scenario did actually happen. The only backup seems to be that it must have happened that way, because otherwise what they believe is wrong.

To them it's always better to make up one more thing than to think.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
#25
RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Ad Neuseum)
(December 10, 2014 at 7:56 pm)dyresand Wrote: Theists reasoning why god exists and their proof
...

I don't call it "circular reasoning". I call it "well-rounded logic".

(December 10, 2014 at 9:06 am)Exian Wrote: This is also what places the OP squarely in the Poe category, even with the tells.

Personally, I would put the presuppositionalist argument differently:

"Nyth nyth Tongue you don't know everything, therefore Jesus"

I mean, that is the presup argument but just boiled down to a single sentence to cut to the chase.

It only makes sense to those who are full of The Holy Spirit.
"You don't need facts when you got Jesus." -Pastor Deacon Fred, Landover Baptist Church

™: True Christian is a Trademark of the Landover Baptist Church. I have no affiliation with this fine group of True Christians ™ because I can't afford their tithing requirements but would like to be. Maybe someday the Lord will bless me with enough riches that I am able to. 

And for the lovers of Poe, here's your winking smiley:  Wink
Reply
#26
RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Ad Neuseum)
(December 11, 2014 at 10:57 am)YahwehIsTheWay Wrote:
(December 10, 2014 at 7:56 pm)dyresand Wrote: Theists reasoning why god exists and their proof
...

I don't call it "circular reasoning". I call it "well-rounded logic".

(December 10, 2014 at 9:06 am)Exian Wrote: This is also what places the OP squarely in the Poe category, even with the tells.

Personally, I would put the presuppositionalist argument differently:

"Nyth nyth Tongue you don't know everything, therefore Jesus"

I mean, that is the presup argument but just boiled down to a single sentence to cut to the chase.

It only makes sense to those who are full of The Holy Spirit.

yes yes jesus was very "special" indeed even in the bible it pointed out jesus was very "special" as a child because he lost his mind and never got it back.
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today. 


Code:
<iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&amp;auto_play=false&amp;hide_related=false&amp;show_comments=true&amp;show_user=true&amp;show_reposts=false&amp;visual=true"></iframe>
Reply
#27
RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Ad Neuseum)
The Romans were really shit if they can't even crucify someone properly.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
#28
RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Ad Neuseum)
(December 11, 2014 at 11:28 am)robvalue Wrote: The Romans were really shit if they can't even crucify someone properly.

the poor guy passed out from blood loss then got up and visited 3 very dumb women who were illiterate then ran off.
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today. 


Code:
<iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&amp;auto_play=false&amp;hide_related=false&amp;show_comments=true&amp;show_user=true&amp;show_reposts=false&amp;visual=true"></iframe>
Reply
#29
RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Ad Neuseum)
(December 11, 2014 at 11:28 am)robvalue Wrote: The Romans were really shit if they can't even crucify someone properly.

A good point. If Jesus really was seen alive after being crucified by the Romans, they'd have shit a brick over that.

The whole point of crucifixion is not just to execute someone but to execute them publicly and painfully on display for all to see as a grim warning "don't fuck with us". They didn't allow their crucified prisoners to be buried either. They left your dead carcass up on that cross to rot, stink and have crows pick your body apart as the final insult. Your corpse only came down when it finally rotted off the cross.

If any condemned criminal were discovered to have survived the execution, the Romans would have spared no expense to hunt them down. It would be like a rebellion going unpunished. Such a thing would damage the whole terrifying point of such a public execution. At the very least, there should be some record of it.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
...      -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
...       -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
Reply
#30
RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Ad Neuseum)
(December 11, 2014 at 11:28 am)robvalue Wrote: The Romans were really shit if they can't even crucify someone properly.

Don't worry. They nailed it!


Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  To Atheists: Who, in your opinion, was Jesus Christ? JJoseph 52 4431 June 12, 2024 at 11:01 pm
Last Post: arewethereyet
  The power of Christ... zwanzig 60 6664 August 30, 2023 at 8:33 pm
Last Post: Bucky Ball
  Jesus Christ is the Beast 666 Satan Emerald_Eyes_Esoteric 36 9490 December 18, 2022 at 10:33 am
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Creating Christ JML 26 4153 September 29, 2022 at 9:40 pm
Last Post: Jehanne
  So has Christ returned TheClearCleanStuff 31 4440 May 20, 2022 at 12:35 pm
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  CHRIST THE KICKER…… BrianSoddingBoru4 15 1732 January 3, 2022 at 10:00 am
Last Post: brewer
  CHRIST THE KILLER..... ronedee 31 4192 December 26, 2021 at 7:11 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
Rainbow Why I believe in Jesus Christ Ai Somoto 20 3511 June 30, 2021 at 4:25 pm
Last Post: Nay_Sayer
  How can a Christian reject part of the Bible and still call themselves a Christian? KUSA 371 101082 May 3, 2020 at 1:04 am
Last Post: Paleophyte
  In what way is the Resurrection the best explanation? GrandizerII 159 21624 November 25, 2019 at 6:46 am
Last Post: Abaddon_ire



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)