But Mr. Greene, that's just biased science propaganda/not the right kind of speciation/something to do with "kinds"/not enough times to be taken seriously/"just not true".

(March 11, 2015 at 11:07 am)Huggy74 Wrote:

(March 11, 2015 at 12:00 am)SteelCurtain Wrote: Ah, the swiftly moving target that is Huggy's argumentative style.

You'll find yourself making an argument about how the fucking moon didn't randomly move 190,000 miles closer to the Earth in a thread about Jesus' marriage.

You can't be serious...
Esquilax is the one that brought up the flood.
If I don't respond I'm dodging, if I do respond, I'm derailing the thread. You guys are a joke.
Now brakeman is whining about me not responding to his post on evolution, I guess that will be my fault too, right?

The changing topics is not so much the issue. It's the rabbit hole that each change in topic leads us down, and the timing of said topic switch.

The fact that when you know you're wrong, your approach is to delve into things like the definition of the word "intimate" when the meaning was clear, or a cherry picked definition of a double negative, instead of sticking to the topic. Because you know you're wrong.

(March 11, 2015 at 11:34 am)FatAndFaithless Wrote: But Mr. Greene, that's just biased science propaganda/not the right kind of speciation/something to do with "kinds"/not enough times to be taken seriously/"just not true".

Ding ding ding.

To the left, we see the red panda eating a bamboo. To the right, we see Huggy still digging. Moving on...

(March 11, 2015 at 11:53 am)FatAndFaithless Wrote:

(March 11, 2015 at 11:34 am)FatAndFaithless Wrote: But Mr. Greene, that's just biased science propaganda/not the right kind of speciation/something to do with "kinds"/not enough times to be taken seriously/"just not true".

Ding ding ding.

You're a genius, It's like I never, said the exact same thing in another thread.

---

(March 11, 2015 at 11:54 am)Norman Humann Wrote: To the left, we see the red panda eating a bamboo. To the right, we see Huggy still digging. Moving on...

And to the front we see someone desperate to get a high post count.

(March 11, 2015 at 11:55 am)Huggy74 Wrote:

(March 11, 2015 at 11:53 am)FatAndFaithless Wrote: Ding ding ding.

You're a genius, It's like theists cling to the same handful of ignorant, unscientific, incomprehensible objections and simply repeat them over and over again without even attempting to explain them

B mine, fixed that for you.

(March 11, 2015 at 11:55 am)Huggy74 Wrote:

(March 11, 2015 at 11:54 am)Norman Humann Wrote: To the left, we see the red panda eating a bamboo. To the right, we see Huggy still digging. Moving on...

And to the front we see someone desperate to get a high post count.

I gotta tell you, I get this perverse satisfaction whenever you resort to ad hominem, Huggy. And didn't you ask me already? I told you. I don't have a life.

(March 11, 2015 at 11:50 am)Huggy74 Wrote: A Great Dane and Chihuahua belong to the same species.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reproductiv..._isolation

You do realize that inability to mate ultimately could result in different species, right?

While Great Danes and Chihuahuas can mate biologically *so far*, if they are unable to mate mechanically, they could diverge into multiple species.

It's not as simple as you make it out to be.

All that is required is isolation. Mechanical isolation is just one possibility.

If you're going to argue and don't want to appear the fool, read for Zeus' sake.

(March 11, 2015 at 12:07 pm)Norman Humann Wrote:

(March 11, 2015 at 11:55 am)Huggy74 Wrote: And to the front we see someone desperate to get a high post count.

I gotta tell you, I get this perverse satisfaction whenever you resort to ad hominem, Huggy. And didn't you ask me already? I told you. I don't have a life.

When they resort to digs about your post-count, you know you've struck a nerve; they're trying to get paybacks.

Also, lol at Buggy getting upset about "speciation" not being synonymous to "species" -- duh, brotha. "Speciation" is a verb, "species" is a noun, and you're an uneducated dolt who clearly hasn't studied evolution in an academic setting. You have my pity, Buggy.