(March 19, 2015 at 6:21 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: Would my previous sig be considered trolling after rhythm gave expressed permission to post it?

Don't you have an own statement to make?

(March 19, 2015 at 6:21 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: Question
Would my previous sig be considered trolling after rhythm gave expressed permission to post it?

I'm not sure, and I'd probably leave that up to the rest of the staff. Personally, I would consider it trolling because the intention behind it was the same as this new one. But then, we never act alone on these things, and unless five of m'colleagues see it the same way, nothing would come of it.

(March 19, 2015 at 5:59 pm)SnakeOilWarrior Wrote:

(March 19, 2015 at 5:49 pm)rexbeccarox Wrote: It's a non-issue now, as we have permanently suspended Huggy's signature.

I'll bet there will be a right awful tizzy thrown over that!

Really? injustice is a way of life for me baby.
This is a non-factor.

Oh, Jesus Christ

Probably shouldn't get up on that cross until you can dishonestly redefine it by fiat, and force it to answer a yes or no question, Huggy. Wouldn't want to start breaking that pattern now.

Don't you just love it when they squeal about Staff doing the job for which we were selected? Injustice, my arse. I know some forums that would permaban for less. Go out into the real world if you want to see some injustice.

(March 20, 2015 at 1:34 am)Stimbo Wrote: Don't you just love it when they squeal about Staff doing the job for which we were selected? Injustice, my arse. I know some forums that would permaban for less. Go out into the real world if you want to see some injustice.

It would appear that you didn't understand my statement.

Quote:Don't you just love it when they squeal about Staff doing the job for which we were selected?

I would imagine that's the same way a jury that's "non-diverse" justifies their decision.

How would diversity, in the sense that you probably mean, have affected the Staff decision in this case? If you're trying to set up a case for Staff bias, put on your big boy pants and just say it.

Besides which, I can't help what you imagine or how things appear to you.

(March 20, 2015 at 2:13 am)Stimbo Wrote: How would diversity, in the sense that you probably mean, have affected the Staff decision in this case? If you're trying to set up a case for Staff bias, put on your big boy pants and just say it.

Besides which, I can't help what you imagine or how things appear to you.

That
I'm not imagining anything, it is unfair to be judged by your accuser...that's a fact.

If your saying the person that brought the allegations played no part in the proceedings, then I stand corrected.

Then that is an assurance I am happy to be able to give. You would be correct that it is unfair to have the person bringing the charge in a position where they can pass judgement. Fortunately, every time a member of Staff here finds themselves in such a situation, he or she abdicates themselves from the discussion.

Can we now consider the matter closed?