(March 29, 2015 at 9:14 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote:

(March 28, 2015 at 3:28 am)Riketto Wrote: By the way thack, if you rely on the support that your friends can give you think again.
I already knocked them down before when they fail to prove that man is omnivore and other things so if you can is much better that you rely on your own intellect but to do this you will have to state only what can be proved not on your fantasies.

Lying again Riketto.  

http://atheistforums.org/thread-24304-po...#pid639279

You are 100% correct.
Man can run faster than the prey and he can catch it easily.
At the moment man lost a bit of stamina because he sit for too long in front of the computer but with a bit of exercise he can regain his strength.
No problem with that.
Man originally born with big claws so he could knock down the pray so he is a natural predator.
At the moment man is doing too many manicure so the claws can not grow but as he stop this bad habit he can grow really good claws.
With his big canines man can kill the prey by biting the throat.
No problem with that but he should keep on sharpening his canine time by time.
I do that and the result speak for themselves.
At the sight of blood and fresh meat man salivate.
This is quite natural for an omnivore like the man.
And what about the yummy raw meat?
Omnivore eat raw meat so it is natural for an omnivore like man to eat the meat 100% raw.
Human digestive system is just made to deal with raw meat.
Although there is some divergences about the length of the digestive system nevertheless man digestive system can easily 
cope with saturated fat, cholesterol and toxins.
No problem with that.
Vascular diseases, diabetes and other diseases have really nothing to do with meat.
So what can i say other than apologize for my lies? 

(March 29, 2015 at 10:59 am)Tonus Wrote:

(March 29, 2015 at 7:07 am)Riketto Wrote: You guys don't even prove anything after you state something. 

So the key is to never "state" anything without claiming it is just "a belief" and then you never have to prove it.  That explains your posting history, I guess.

Ton.
If you would enter the spiritual world i could state to you that God exist.
You could easily find that out by searching within.
But you pretend that God if he ever exist should be found outside 
or could be perceived in a physical way which is absolutely absurd
that is why i don't really want to state that God exist as far as 
someone pretend to find him externally.   

In other words, if you could prove that god exists, you would prove that god exists. Since you can't, you will fall back on "believe" and nonsense like "searching within." Looks to me like god either does not exist, or does not want to be found. Either way, not a problem for me.

(March 30, 2015 at 10:23 am)Tonus Wrote: In other words, if you could prove that god exists, you would prove that god exists.  Since you can't, you will fall back on "believe" and nonsense like "searching within."  Looks to me like god either does not exist, or does not want to be found.  Either way, not a problem for me.

If you don't search in the correct place it is obvious that you will never find that particular thing.
Have you ever seen someone searching for gold in the ocean or a fisherman searching for fishes
in the desert?    

(March 30, 2015 at 10:36 am)Riketto Wrote:

(March 30, 2015 at 10:23 am)Tonus Wrote: In other words, if you could prove that god exists, you would prove that god exists.  Since you can't, you will fall back on "believe" and nonsense like "searching within."  Looks to me like god either does not exist, or does not want to be found.  Either way, not a problem for me.

If you don't search in the correct place it is obvious that you will never find that particular thing.

And telling people to "search within" is nonsense.  Within what?  The "self?"  The human body?  The chest cavity?  The anus?

Why do you types always seem to assume that no one ever performed some manner of introspection before?  It's not as if every person that "looks within" comes to the same conclusion, so why would you tell them to "look within" in order to find X?  Because we all know that as soon as they say they found something else, the excuses and rationalizations begin.  Which is to say, you start to paper over one pile of nonsense with more nonsense.

That cracked me up Ooh pun fun!

If God is everywhere I shouldn't have to be rooting around for him in my crack.

Keep trying to delude yourself until you're deluded?

I can easily understand your skepticism.
You say........if God is everywhere i should find him everywhere not just within.
Good point in a way but you never considered that externally you can only find
the cruder expression of God like the matter and the other fundamental factors
like space, air, light and water.
It is all part and parcel of God according to yoga but these elements offer less 
and less consciousness so it is obvious that you are not able to see so much God in them
if none at all.
Suppose you create in your mind a picture of something.
That picture belong to you.
It is your energy that build that picture but at the same time your 100%
consciousness has been turned into less than 100% and if we go down and down
to the creation where the pure matter exist than we may only found less than 1%
of consciousness.
How can you find 100% consciousness and experience the real thing?
Easy.
All you got to do is to go back to that pure consciousness that create everything 
in the first place leaving the cruder manifestation well behind especially the matter.
(materialism)
How you do that?
Just look at yourself.
The glands that control the matter and liquid factors lie at the bottom of your body
but those who control the mind and the higher consciousness lie at the very top 
of your spinal cord so it is here that you can find the higher degree of consciousness
and therefore the one who create everything.   

Voted No. I was briefly a theist of sorts when I was in primary school and adults talked about god, but grew out of it as I got older and got into Science.

(April 25, 2015 at 4:27 am)Red Economist Wrote: Voted No. I was briefly a theist of sorts when I was in primary school and adults talked about god, but grew out of it as I got older and got into Science.

What a surprise!
I didn't know that by studying science you could come to the conclusion that God doesn't exist. 

Interesting how the only way to make your point appear to work is by misrepresenting RE's. Interesting and faintly sad.