Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: January 11, 2025, 6:59 pm

Poll: Was Hitler objectively bad?
This poll is closed.
Yes
52.63%
20 52.63%
No
39.47%
15 39.47%
I dont know
7.89%
3 7.89%
Total 38 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Was Hitler objectively bad?
#71
RE: Was Hitler objectively bad?
Yeah, but the didn't decide to kill millions of innocent people for no reason. Fair enough, the Allies killed millions of innocent people as well, but in retaliation to German aggression, not for a racist idealogy.

Anyway, that wasn't the point of the responce. If Hitler hadn't killed millions of innocent people for no reason, he would be looked at in a much different way. History would have judged him and Germany much differently. The Germans probably would have won the war as well. The resources that went onto killing the Jews was massive & time consuming.

Also, if Hitler was replaced, the German strategy would have been much better. Hitler just made too many mistakes.
Reply
#72
RE: Was Hitler objectively bad?
(October 16, 2010 at 10:47 pm)ib.me.ub Wrote: The basic idea of a single world governmnet is a good one
Rolleyes
Your political philosophy is 'differently able'.
"All these organized crime rackets fight eachother, so if we have one HUGE organized crime racket that controls everything, this will be productive, right?"
Fucking ridiculous.
"Philosophy would do well to desist from issuing any further injunctions about the need to re-establish the meaningfulness of existence, the purposefulness of life, or mend the shattered concord between man and nature. It should strive to be more than a sop to the pathetic twinge of human self-esteem. Nihilism is not an existential quandary but a speculative opportunity." - Ray Brassier
My Blog, Nazis are Sexy
Reply
#73
RE: Was Hitler objectively bad?
So what do you suppose then, just kill the lot, drop the bomb! If you feel that way about the world, im sure your area has a bridge!!!
Reply
#74
RE: Was Hitler objectively bad?
ib.me.ub Wrote:Allies killed millions of innocent people as well, but in retaliation to German aggression
Also retarded. The allies killed millions of people in a war-mongering crusade for democracy. It took America and Britain to make it a world war, they vastly escalated it, carried on a war of aggression neither Japan nor Germany never wanted, propped up a Communist regime.

Your history is stupid bullshit. You know those things they told you in school? Those are called lies.
"Philosophy would do well to desist from issuing any further injunctions about the need to re-establish the meaningfulness of existence, the purposefulness of life, or mend the shattered concord between man and nature. It should strive to be more than a sop to the pathetic twinge of human self-esteem. Nihilism is not an existential quandary but a speculative opportunity." - Ray Brassier
My Blog, Nazis are Sexy
Reply
#75
RE: Was Hitler objectively bad?
Quote:It took America and Britain to make it a world war, they vastly escalated it, carried on a war of aggression neither Japan nor Germany never wanted, propped up a Communist regime.

This is bullshit. So Germany didn't invade sovereign countries. Your history is the stupid bullshit lady.
Reply
#76
RE: Was Hitler objectively bad?
(October 16, 2010 at 11:13 pm)ib.me.ub Wrote: This is bullshit. So Germany didn't invade sovereign countries.
What the fuck does that have to do with England declaring war on Germany? England started that shit.
Or FDR provoking the Japanese for years on end?

Since you obviously haven't actually read any real history, I am done talking to you. Have fun with your Democracy is Heaven and FDR was Jesus fantasies, fag.
"Philosophy would do well to desist from issuing any further injunctions about the need to re-establish the meaningfulness of existence, the purposefulness of life, or mend the shattered concord between man and nature. It should strive to be more than a sop to the pathetic twinge of human self-esteem. Nihilism is not an existential quandary but a speculative opportunity." - Ray Brassier
My Blog, Nazis are Sexy
Reply
#77
RE: Was Hitler objectively bad?
lol. Sounds as if you need to go back to high school. Don't think you will be here for long.
Reply
#78
RE: Was Hitler objectively bad?
Quote:Yeah, but the didn't decide to kill millions of innocent people for no reason.

Oh, Hitler had a reason. You may not think it was a very good reason but then, you weren't on the losing side of the First World War.

Britain and France reacted when Hitler invaded Poland. They sat on their hands through Hitler's earlier moves. Perhaps Hitler merely miscalculated their resolve?

Besides, The British and French (and later the US) made an alliance with Stalin who was an even bigger prick than Hitler.

There is no way to make this simple.

"Simple" is for the bible.
Reply
#79
RE: Was Hitler objectively bad?
(October 16, 2010 at 11:48 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Oh, Hitler had a reason. You may not think it was a very good reason but then, you weren't on the losing side of the First World War.

Britain and France reacted when Hitler invaded Poland. They sat on their hands through Hitler's earlier moves. Perhaps Hitler merely miscalculated their resolve?

Besides, The British and French (and later the US) made an alliance with Stalin who was an even bigger prick than Hitler.

There is no way to make this simple.

"Simple" is for the bible.
I can make it real simple. Kill 'em all.

"Philosophy would do well to desist from issuing any further injunctions about the need to re-establish the meaningfulness of existence, the purposefulness of life, or mend the shattered concord between man and nature. It should strive to be more than a sop to the pathetic twinge of human self-esteem. Nihilism is not an existential quandary but a speculative opportunity." - Ray Brassier
My Blog, Nazis are Sexy
Reply
#80
RE: Was Hitler objectively bad?
You sure you're not religious?

That sounds like the holier-than-thou crowd.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Can too much respect be bad? Fake Messiah 48 6734 January 14, 2020 at 11:28 am
Last Post: roofinggiant
  Technology, Good or Bad Overall? ColdComfort 41 7524 July 7, 2019 at 1:02 pm
Last Post: Chad32
  Emotions are intrinsically good and bad Transcended Dimensions 713 132833 February 25, 2018 at 11:32 pm
Last Post: bennyboy
  Name one objectively bad person ErGingerbreadMandude 57 16545 October 16, 2017 at 3:47 am
Last Post: Ignorant
  Is there a logical, rational reason why hate is bad? WisdomOfTheTrees 27 4566 February 4, 2017 at 10:43 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Is developing a strong habit of philosophizing bad for your social skills? Edwardo Piet 31 5068 May 25, 2016 at 8:22 am
Last Post: Gemini
Smile a bad person Sappho 30 6158 December 8, 2015 at 7:59 pm
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic
  The bad guy Marsellus Wallace 18 6134 July 28, 2015 at 8:15 am
Last Post: Marsellus Wallace
  What makes a person bad? Losty 53 15310 December 3, 2014 at 6:38 pm
Last Post: Losty
  >without the bad you can't appreciate the good MusicLovingAtheist 19 4540 October 22, 2014 at 10:41 am
Last Post: bennyboy



Users browsing this thread: 16 Guest(s)