The real strawman is theists who attempt to attack atheism as if it's some kind of exclusive belief system to which all atheists adhere.
/end thread
/end thread
"The New Atheists are back — and dumber than ever"
|
The real strawman is theists who attempt to attack atheism as if it's some kind of exclusive belief system to which all atheists adhere.
/end thread
Delicate perfectly describes this idiot's relationship with reality.
(December 25, 2015 at 5:19 pm)Stimbo Wrote:(December 25, 2015 at 5:09 pm)Delicate Wrote: That's exactly what I'm doing. I'm just pointing out errors in beliefs. Errors in beliefs. Whose? Ours? I'm sure there are Muslims out there that would be happy to point out errors in YOUR beliefs. In fact, with over 3/4 of the planet not Xtian, there are around 5 billion people alive today who might point out errors in your beliefs, if they actually wanted to be as rude and offensive as you are. My beliefs, or lack of them, my stance on religion is none of your business. How dare you come into OUR HOUSE and try to point out errors in our beliefs? If you have the capability to do so at all, imagine, for just one moment, someone walking into your kitchen and belittling you, calling you stupid and incompetent and deluded, because of the things you believe. You are THAT person. I pity you.
"The family that prays together...is brainwashing their children."- Albert Einstein
(December 25, 2015 at 6:12 pm)Simon Moon Wrote:(December 25, 2015 at 6:01 pm)Delicate Wrote: I'm not denying anything people believe, per se. I accept that the position they stake out in public is "lack of evidence"Atheism, for the vast majority of atheists, is not an assertion. It is a response to a claim. If you construe it as a response, my question is, what justifies the response? The answer I've gotten so far is: Nothing. (December 25, 2015 at 8:42 pm)Delicate Wrote:(December 25, 2015 at 6:12 pm)Simon Moon Wrote: Atheism, for the vast majority of atheists, is not an assertion. It is a response to a claim. We have given you our justification, quite clearly, dozens of times. Lack of scientific evidence. That's all. You have given us nothing but logical fallacies and abuse. We have gotten nothing from you, despite all of your claims to have evidence that we are too stupid and incompetent to recognize. The one who is empty is you. You give nothing but evil.
"The family that prays together...is brainwashing their children."- Albert Einstein
(December 25, 2015 at 8:42 pm)Delicate Wrote:(December 25, 2015 at 6:12 pm)Simon Moon Wrote: Atheism, for the vast majority of atheists, is not an assertion. It is a response to a claim. Why do I need to justify a response to your claim? That's how an exchange works. You made a claim, I asked for evidence. You're unable provide any. Therefore I must conclude your claim is likely false. Seems pretty simple to me.
Oh dear. I fear we have disappointed this very discerning theist, inDelicate.[/sarcasm]
RE: "The New Atheists are back — and dumber than ever"
December 26, 2015 at 1:42 am
(This post was last modified: December 26, 2015 at 1:50 am by Simon Moon.)
(December 25, 2015 at 8:42 pm)Delicate Wrote:(December 25, 2015 at 6:12 pm)Simon Moon Wrote: Atheism, for the vast majority of atheists, is not an assertion. It is a response to a claim. Oh blood f'n hell! I am justified to continue my disbelief in the existence of gods based on the continued lack of demonstrable, verifiable, falsifiable evidence, reasoned argument and valid and sound logic to support theist's claims that a god does exists. Pretty much the exact same reasons I disbelieve: alien abductions, witch craft, bigfoot, Tarot card reading, dowsing, talking to the dead, etc, etc, ad nauseam. The reason why you continue to get "nothing" as a response, is because you continue to not provide us with any evidence for your god claims that will pass the above criteria. Once again, i am not claiming, with absolute certainty, that a god does not exist. My position is that a case for the existence of a god has never met its burden of proof. As long as the claim that god exists does not meet its burden of proof, my atheism will continue. But you haven't really been getting "nothing" as a response, have you? What you've been getting, over and over, is requests to provide your evidence for the existence of the god you claim exists. If it meets the above criteria, I will be compelled, by my skepticism and intellectual honesty, to accept, (tentatively) your claim is true. It is becoming more and more obvious, that you are intellectually dishonest. Or maybe just dense. You pick. You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.
I read that last as "You prick". I do apologise...
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|