Posts: 7045
Threads: 20
Joined: June 17, 2014
Reputation:
55
RE: Intelligent Design (brief overview).
May 7, 2018 at 9:43 am
(May 7, 2018 at 9:42 am)MysticKnight Wrote: (May 7, 2018 at 9:41 am)FatAndFaithless Wrote: "Everyone else is wrong, God has revealed the truth to me." That's some dangerous thinking there, MK. How the hell did you end up that far down the rabbit hole?
It's called having some courage to not be intimated by people claiming they have knowledge when they are not trustworthy enough to use reasoning nor humble enough to accept the truth.
The irony of that statement is staggering. Particularly the bolded part.
In every country and every age, the priest had been hostile to Liberty.
- Thomas Jefferson
Posts: 7568
Threads: 20
Joined: July 26, 2013
Reputation:
54
RE: Intelligent Design (brief overview).
May 7, 2018 at 9:46 am
(May 7, 2018 at 9:42 am)MysticKnight Wrote: (May 7, 2018 at 9:41 am)FatAndFaithless Wrote: "Everyone else is wrong, God has revealed the truth to me." That's some dangerous thinking there, MK. How the hell did you end up that far down the rabbit hole?
It's called having some courage to not be intimated by people claiming they have knowledge when they are not trustworthy enough to use reasoning nor humble enough to accept the truth.
And that's called weapons-grade bullshit. Jesus, MK! You might be one of the most irony-challenged people I've ever encountered -- even if you are courageous, knowledgeable, and humble. Lol
Posts: 19881
Threads: 324
Joined: July 31, 2016
Reputation:
34
RE: Intelligent Design (brief overview).
May 7, 2018 at 9:52 am
(May 7, 2018 at 9:18 am)MysticKnight Wrote: I don't believe in scientific authority.
And that's all the news from the 11th C. Tune in later as we update you on the latest shamanism developments.
Posts: 2412
Threads: 5
Joined: January 3, 2018
Reputation:
22
RE: Intelligent Design (brief overview).
May 7, 2018 at 10:05 am
(May 7, 2018 at 9:18 am)MysticKnight Wrote: I don't believe in scientific authority. Sorry. I see it clear as daylight. Design is so manifest and has always been manifest.
I don't care about that peer journalism bullshit.
There is no reason to trust any authority in this time where humans are ruled by deceivers.
Consciousness is binary. Yes there is various levels of it, but at the end, either something is or isn't conscious.
(May 7, 2018 at 7:02 am)polymath257 Wrote: Too bad there are no actual examples of irreducible complexity. ALL examples have been explained as *reducible* to prior states.
There are plenty of examples. You just have to understand the problem properly. There aren't any. You just have to understand the problem properly.
Posts: 8207
Threads: 40
Joined: March 18, 2014
Reputation:
54
RE: Intelligent Design (brief overview).
May 7, 2018 at 10:15 am
MK, you can argue with the facts all day long. Thru will remain unchanged and you will remain unchangingly wrong.
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.
Posts: 7392
Threads: 53
Joined: January 15, 2015
Reputation:
88
RE: Intelligent Design (brief overview).
May 7, 2018 at 10:34 am
(May 7, 2018 at 9:18 am)MysticKnight Wrote: I don't believe in scientific authority. Sorry. I see it clear as daylight. Design is so manifest and has always been manifest.
I don't care about that peer journalism bullshit.
There is no reason to trust any authority in this time where humans are ruled by deceivers.
Consciousness is binary. Yes there is various levels of it, but at the end, either something is or isn't conscious.
So there is absolute no point in debating you. Whatever anyone says will be a waste of time. You are closed to evidence that does not confirm your own world view. You might as well believe in the tooth fairy, Santa or the christian god.
Posts: 6002
Threads: 252
Joined: January 2, 2013
Reputation:
30
RE: Intelligent Design (brief overview).
May 7, 2018 at 10:40 am
In relation to consciousness being binary, you can view it that way but I don't see what it has to do with anything.
You can say someone can either be able to see or not be able to see. That doesn't mean that the eye is irreducibly complex.
Just like there's different types of eye, more complex eyes and more primitive light sensors there's different levels of brain complexity which is obvious, and within your life experience. You were once an unborn baby and not at the same level of consciousness as you are now because your brain wasn't developed enough to think complex thoughts like you can do now. Before your brain developed you had no consciousness.
Are you ready for the fire? We are firemen. WE ARE FIREMEN! The heat doesn’t bother us. We live in the heat. We train in the heat. It tells us that we’re ready, we’re at home, we’re where we’re supposed to be. Flames don’t intimidate us. What do we do? We control the flame. We control them. We move the flames where we want to. And then we extinguish them.
Impersonation is treason.
Posts: 67114
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
162
RE: Intelligent Design (brief overview).
May 7, 2018 at 10:54 am
(May 7, 2018 at 9:18 am)MysticKnight Wrote: I don't believe in scientific authority. Sorry. I see it clear as daylight. Design is so manifest and has always been manifest. You have to think that some piece of anatomy or genetics -exists- in order to wonder how it came to be. Then you'd have to have some idea as to how that anatomy or genetics could interact with other parts of your "complex system" in order to show that they have some sort of practical depedency. Then you'd have to show that there was a system or process or manner in which this anatomy or genetics is produced that -couldn't- produce this specific configuration.
That;s a whole lot of scientific authority just to set the stage for your science denial, don;t you think?
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 19789
Threads: 57
Joined: September 24, 2010
Reputation:
85
RE: Intelligent Design (brief overview).
May 7, 2018 at 11:13 am
(May 7, 2018 at 10:54 am)Khemikal Wrote: (May 7, 2018 at 9:18 am)MysticKnight Wrote: I don't believe in scientific authority. Sorry. I see it clear as daylight. Design is so manifest and has always been manifest. You have to think that some piece of anatomy or genetics -exists- in order to wonder how it came to be. Then you'd have to have some idea as to how that anatomy or genetics could interact with other parts of your "complex system" in order to show that they have some sort of practical depedency. Then you'd have to show that there was a system or process or manner in which this anatomy or genetics is produced that -couldn't- produce this specific configuration.
That;s a whole lot of scientific authority just to set the stage for your science denial, don;t you think?
He has become an would be rik, one might as well try teaching the scientific method to a chimp.
Posts: 5941
Threads: 112
Joined: January 8, 2016
Reputation:
50
RE: Intelligent Design (brief overview).
May 7, 2018 at 11:27 am
(May 7, 2018 at 9:30 am)LadyForCamus Wrote: Then what is the point of having any discussion with you at all?
There isn't one. I learned that a while ago, the faster other people realize the quicker he'll just stop. He needs an audience.
|