Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 8, 2024, 10:24 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Intelligent Design (brief overview).
#31
RE: Intelligent Design (brief overview).
(May 7, 2018 at 9:42 am)MysticKnight Wrote:
(May 7, 2018 at 9:41 am)FatAndFaithless Wrote: "Everyone else is wrong, God has revealed the truth to me."  That's some dangerous thinking there, MK.  How the hell did you end up that far down the rabbit hole?

It's called having some courage to not be intimated by people claiming they have knowledge when they are not trustworthy enough to use reasoning nor humble enough to accept the truth.

The irony of that statement is staggering.  Particularly the bolded part.
In every country and every age, the priest had been hostile to Liberty.
- Thomas Jefferson
Reply
#32
RE: Intelligent Design (brief overview).
(May 7, 2018 at 9:42 am)MysticKnight Wrote:
(May 7, 2018 at 9:41 am)FatAndFaithless Wrote: "Everyone else is wrong, God has revealed the truth to me."  That's some dangerous thinking there, MK.  How the hell did you end up that far down the rabbit hole?

It's called having some courage to not be intimated by people claiming they have knowledge when they are not trustworthy enough to use reasoning nor humble enough to accept the truth.

And that's called weapons-grade bullshit. Jesus, MK! You might be one of the most irony-challenged people I've ever encountered -- even if you are courageous, knowledgeable, and humble. Lol
Reply
#33
RE: Intelligent Design (brief overview).
(May 7, 2018 at 9:18 am)MysticKnight Wrote: I don't believe in scientific authority. 

And that's all the news from the 11th C. Tune in later as we update you on the latest shamanism developments.
Reply
#34
RE: Intelligent Design (brief overview).
(May 7, 2018 at 9:18 am)MysticKnight Wrote: I don't believe in scientific authority. Sorry.  I see it clear as daylight. Design is so manifest and has always been manifest.

I don't care about that peer journalism bullshit. 

There is no reason to trust any authority in this time where humans are ruled by deceivers.

Consciousness is binary. Yes there is various levels of it, but at the end, either something is or isn't conscious.

(May 7, 2018 at 7:02 am)polymath257 Wrote: Too bad there are no actual examples of irreducible complexity. ALL examples have been explained as *reducible* to prior states.

There are plenty of examples. You just have to understand the problem properly.
There aren't any. You just have to understand the problem properly.
Reply
#35
RE: Intelligent Design (brief overview).
MK, you can argue with the facts all day long. Thru will remain unchanged and you will remain unchangingly wrong.
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.
Reply
#36
RE: Intelligent Design (brief overview).
(May 7, 2018 at 9:18 am)MysticKnight Wrote: I don't believe in scientific authority. Sorry.  I see it clear as daylight. Design is so manifest and has always been manifest.

I don't care about that peer journalism bullshit. 

There is no reason to trust any authority in this time where humans are ruled by deceivers.

Consciousness is binary. Yes there is various levels of it, but at the end, either something is or isn't conscious.

So there is absolute no point in debating you. Whatever anyone says will be a waste of time. You are closed to evidence that does not confirm your own world view. You might as well believe in the tooth fairy, Santa or the christian god.
Reply
#37
RE: Intelligent Design (brief overview).
In relation to consciousness being binary, you can view it that way but I don't see what it has to do with anything. 

You can say someone can either be able to see or not be able to see.  That doesn't mean that the eye is irreducibly complex.  

Just like there's different types of eye, more complex eyes and more primitive light sensors there's different levels of brain complexity which is obvious, and within your life experience. You were once an unborn baby and not at the same level of consciousness as you are now because your brain wasn't developed enough to think complex thoughts like you can do now.  Before your brain developed you had no consciousness.


Are you ready for the fire? We are firemen. WE ARE FIREMEN! The heat doesn’t bother us. We live in the heat. We train in the heat. It tells us that we’re ready, we’re at home, we’re where we’re supposed to be. Flames don’t intimidate us. What do we do? We control the flame. We control them. We move the flames where we want to. And then we extinguish them.

Impersonation is treason.





Reply
#38
RE: Intelligent Design (brief overview).
(May 7, 2018 at 9:18 am)MysticKnight Wrote: I don't believe in scientific authority. Sorry.  I see it clear as daylight. Design is so manifest and has always been manifest.
You have to think that some piece of anatomy or genetics -exists- in order to wonder how it came to be.  Then you'd have to have some idea as to how that anatomy or genetics could interact with other parts of your "complex system" in order to show that they have some sort of practical depedency.  Then you'd have to show that there was a system or process or manner in which this anatomy or genetics is produced that -couldn't- produce this specific configuration.

That;s a whole lot of scientific authority just to set the stage for your science denial, don;t you think?
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
#39
RE: Intelligent Design (brief overview).
(May 7, 2018 at 10:54 am)Khemikal Wrote:
(May 7, 2018 at 9:18 am)MysticKnight Wrote: I don't believe in scientific authority. Sorry.  I see it clear as daylight. Design is so manifest and has always been manifest.
You have to think that some piece of anatomy or genetics -exists- in order to wonder how it came to be.  Then you'd have to have some idea as to how that anatomy or genetics could interact with other parts of your "complex system" in order to show that they have some sort of practical depedency.  Then you'd have to show that there was a system or process or manner in which this anatomy or genetics is produced that -couldn't- produce this specific configuration.

That;s a whole lot of scientific authority just to set the stage for your science denial, don;t you think?


He has become an would be rik, one might as well try teaching the scientific method to a chimp.
Reply
#40
RE: Intelligent Design (brief overview).
(May 7, 2018 at 9:30 am)LadyForCamus Wrote: Then what is the point of having any discussion with you at all?

There isn't one. I learned that a while ago, the faster other people realize the quicker he'll just stop. He needs an audience.
[Image: nL4L1haz_Qo04rZMFtdpyd1OZgZf9NSnR9-7hAWT...dc2a24480e]
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Intelligent Falling Dundee 9 1786 October 5, 2020 at 1:41 am
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  A Working Draft Design Argument Acrobat 54 7097 October 19, 2019 at 10:28 am
Last Post: Pat Mustard
  Intelligent (?) Design Minimalist 12 4673 August 21, 2017 at 1:23 am
Last Post: Minimalist
  If God of Abraham is true, then why didnt he use his intelligent design to make a new Roeki 129 50297 July 9, 2017 at 2:11 am
Last Post: Astonished
  Finely-tuned universe wanted: Intelligent Designers need not apply. Time Traveler 38 10134 April 11, 2016 at 9:01 pm
Last Post: Simon Moon
  The stupid "Apex" "design" argument..... Brian37 23 6552 March 4, 2016 at 11:32 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
Video Intelligent Design, The Designer is Drunk! Mental Outlaw 6 2386 March 15, 2015 at 6:24 pm
Last Post: robvalue
  Disbelief in an intelligent creator = far fetched? Silver 39 9027 January 12, 2015 at 10:07 am
Last Post: Nope
  Why intelligent design "proofs" are pointless robvalue 27 6963 September 13, 2014 at 4:14 pm
Last Post: fr0d0
  I find it hilarious when men argue intelligent design. Lemonvariable72 10 4650 December 3, 2013 at 6:03 am
Last Post: Mothonis



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)