Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 22, 2024, 8:37 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Atheist VS Naturalist - the latter sounds more appealing to me...
RE: Atheist VS Naturalist - the latter sounds more appealing to me...
(June 1, 2020 at 5:05 pm)Belacqua Wrote:
(June 1, 2020 at 8:10 am)polymath257 Wrote: The scientific method goes far beyond what the Tufts University description says. ALL that needs to happens is that there are observable patterns in what happens. And if there are such patterns, science can be done.

The passage I quoted isn't a comprehensive description of the scientific method. It's about methodological naturalism. I thought it was strange that you repeatedly advocate methodological naturalism while denying that such a thing is necessary. 

Quote:If we observed ghosts and those ghosts had detectable patterns of behavior, then science can study ghosts.

I'm glad you've come around to my position on this. 

I've said repeatedly that things have natures, and that if they do only what is in accord with their natures then the thing is natural. I've pointed out that many Christians say that God is natural because he only is and does in accord with his nature. 

You resisted this at first but it seems we agree on this part now.

I'd change that slightly and say that *if* God exists, he/she/it is natural. Smile
Reply
RE: Atheist VS Naturalist - the latter sounds more appealing to me...
(June 1, 2020 at 5:20 pm)polymath257 Wrote:
(June 1, 2020 at 5:05 pm)Belacqua Wrote: The passage I quoted isn't a comprehensive description of the scientific method. It's about methodological naturalism. I thought it was strange that you repeatedly advocate methodological naturalism while denying that such a thing is necessary. 


I'm glad you've come around to my position on this. 

I've said repeatedly that things have natures, and that if they do only what is in accord with their natures then the thing is natural. I've pointed out that many Christians say that God is natural because he only is and does in accord with his nature. 

You resisted this at first but it seems we agree on this part now.

I'd change that slightly and say that *if* God exists, he/she/it is natural. Smile

Maybe if god could be observed in some way then it would be natural. made up definitions for a god don't constitute a nature.
'Those who ask a lot of questions may seem stupid, but those who don't ask questions stay stupid'
Reply
RE: Atheist VS Naturalist - the latter sounds more appealing to me...
@LadyForCamus

My "Alerts" list indicates that you've replied to me a couple of times in the last hour or so, but I don't see the posts. It may be that my computer is glitching.

I'm not ignoring you.
Reply
RE: Atheist VS Naturalist - the latter sounds more appealing to me...
(May 31, 2020 at 10:13 pm)Belacqua Wrote: This is from Tufts University:

Quote:Methodological naturalism is not a "doctrine" but an essential aspect of the methodology of science, the study of the natural universe. If one believes that natural laws and theories based on them will not suffice to solve the problems attacked by scientists - that supernatural and thus nonscientific principles must be invoked from time to time - then one cannot have the confidence in scientific methodology that is prerequisite to doing science. The spectacular successes over four centuries of science based on methodological naturalism cannot be gainsaid. On the other hand, a scientist who, when stumped, invokes a supernatural cause for a phenomenon he or she is investigating is guaranteed that no scientific understanding of the problem will ensue.

Yes it's a good read but I fail to see how it supports your position, If you had a position that is.

Bel, what's the difference between an apologist for god and an apologist for the supernatural?
How could an outsider looking in decide?
Miserable Bastard.
Reply
RE: Atheist VS Naturalist - the latter sounds more appealing to me...
If the past is any indication, he'll decide that there's no way to decide.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
RE: Atheist VS Naturalist - the latter sounds more appealing to me...
(June 1, 2020 at 6:55 pm)possibletarian Wrote:
(June 1, 2020 at 5:20 pm)polymath257 Wrote: I'd change that slightly and say that *if* God exists, he/she/it is natural. Smile

Maybe if god could be observed in some way then it would be natural. made up definitions for a god don't constitute a nature.

And I have yet to see a good, operational definition of the term 'God'.
Reply
RE: Atheist VS Naturalist - the latter sounds more appealing to me...
(June 2, 2020 at 8:27 am)polymath257 Wrote: And I have yet to see a good, operational definition of the term 'God'.

This just shows that you're not paying attention. There are good clear definitions.
Reply
RE: Atheist VS Naturalist - the latter sounds more appealing to me...
As good and clear as your definitions of natural and supernatural?
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
RE: Atheist VS Naturalist - the latter sounds more appealing to me...
(June 2, 2020 at 8:31 am)Belacqua Wrote:
(June 2, 2020 at 8:27 am)polymath257 Wrote: And I have yet to see a good, operational definition of the term 'God'.

This just shows that you're not paying attention. There are good clear definitions.

Please give one.

I am still waiting for your definition of 'natural' that would allow for a supernatural.
Reply
RE: Atheist VS Naturalist - the latter sounds more appealing to me...
(June 2, 2020 at 11:46 am)polymath257 Wrote: Please give one.

The form of the good.

Quote:I am still waiting for your definition of 'natural' that would allow for a supernatural.

You rejected the definition by begging the question. We've been through this.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Is life more satisfying as an atheist or religionist? FrustratedFool 96 7818 November 10, 2023 at 11:13 pm
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  No soul? No free will and no responsibility then, yet the latter's essential... Duty 33 5253 August 26, 2020 at 4:35 pm
Last Post: HappySkeptic
  His wish sounds familiar purplepurpose 1 1037 November 16, 2017 at 4:55 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Ugh, how come I, an atheist, have the ability to ACT more "Christian" than...... maestroanth 7 2013 April 9, 2016 at 7:46 pm
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  Religious kids more likely to be cunts than atheist ones Napoléon 12 3218 November 6, 2015 at 5:50 pm
Last Post: paulpablo
  More atheist men than women? Catholic_Lady 203 36229 July 9, 2015 at 9:12 pm
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  Are Deists more like theists or Atheist? Twisted 37 10411 May 28, 2015 at 10:18 am
Last Post: comet
  Why do I find mysticism so appealing? JaceDeanLove 22 7371 December 24, 2014 at 10:39 pm
Last Post: Mystic
  Do we need more Atheist books for kids? process613 43 8836 November 30, 2014 at 4:14 am
Last Post: fr0d0
  Panpsychism is not as crazy as it sounds. Mudhammam 64 19520 May 18, 2014 at 4:25 pm
Last Post: Mudhammam



Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)