Why does god put the needs of the few above the need of the many?

[arewethereyet]

Not according to mainstream theology. 

Really. Get some quotes on this, or take your vile personality, bitch, and you fuck off.

Regards
DL

Well, that's not very Christian of you.

[Angrboda]

Not according to mainstream theology. 

Really. Get some quotes on this, or take your vile personality, bitch, and you fuck off.

Regards
DL

A common response from Christian philosophers, such as Norman Geisler or William Lane Craig, is that the paradox assumes a wrong definition of omnipotence. Omnipotence, they say, does not mean that God can do anything at all but, rather, that he can do anything that is possible according to his nature. The distinction is important. God cannot perform logical absurdities; he cannot, for instance, make 1+1=3. Likewise, God cannot make a being greater than himself because he is, by definition, the greatest possible being. God is limited in his actions to his nature. The Bible supports this, they assert, in passages such as Hebrews 6:18, which says it is "impossible for God to lie."

Wikipedia || Omnipotence paradox

Apparently you're not even Wikipedia smart. I could go on, citing Aquinas for one, but as noted, a) this only applies to a subset of the Christian gods and so leads to another non sequitur, and b) as noted, arguing with you is a waste of time.

[Greatest I am]

Really. Get some quotes on this, or take your vile personality, bitch, and you fuck off.

Regards
DL

Well, that's not very Christian of you.

I am not a Christian. I am a cut above. A Gnostic Christian.

When you know the difference, you will be ready to open your own atheist church and join the atheist elites and brightest.

"that he can do anything that is possible according to his nature."

If god can put the need of the few ahead of the many, he can put the needs of the many ahead of the few.

I cannot argue with those you quote, so prove me wrong with your words, or I will just quote a bunch of garbage right back at you.

Regards
DL

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

Not according to mainstream theology. 

Really. Get some quotes on this, or take your vile personality, bitch, and you fuck off.

Regards
DL

What she’s trying to explain to you, which you seem to fail to grasp, is that it simply isn’t possible for you to know that God ISN’T saving the maximal number of people.

When you resort to abuse, you’ve lost the argument.

Boru

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

Well, that's not very Christian of you.

I am not a Christian. I am a cut above. A Gnostic Christian.

When you know the difference, you will be ready to open your own atheist church and join the atheist elites and brightest.

"that he can do anything that is possible according to his nature."

If god can put the need of the few ahead of the many, he can put the needs of the many ahead of the few.

I cannot argue with those you quote, so prove me wrong with your words, or I will just quote a bunch of garbage right back at you.

Regards
DL

It’s more than slightly stupid of you to demand quotes from mainstream Christian theology, then to reject them when they’re provided.

Boru

[Angrboda]

Well, that's not very Christian of you.

I am not a Christian. I am a cut above. A Gnostic Christian.

[Greatest I am]

Really. Get some quotes on this, or take your vile personality, bitch, and you fuck off.

Regards
DL

What she’s trying to explain to you, which you seem to fail to grasp, is that it simply isn’t possible for you to know that God ISN’T saving the maximal number of people.

When you resort to abuse, you’ve lost the argument.

Boru

Fuck you and insults were first introduced by our friend, so fuck you for your abuse, loser.

Regards
DL

---

I am not a Christian. I am a cut above. A Gnostic Christian.

When you know the difference, you will be ready to open your own atheist church and join the atheist elites and brightest.

"that he can do anything that is possible according to his nature."

If god can put the need of the few ahead of the many, he can put the needs of the many ahead of the few.

I cannot argue with those you quote, so prove me wrong with your words, or I will just quote a bunch of garbage right back at you.

Regards
DL

It’s more than slightly stupid of you to demand quotes from mainstream Christian theology, then to reject them when they’re provided.

Boru

Nothing was offered or rejected.

Mind your own business, stupid.

Regards
DL

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

What she’s trying to explain to you, which you seem to fail to grasp, is that it simply isn’t possible for you to know that God ISN’T saving the maximal number of people.

When you resort to abuse, you’ve lost the argument.

Boru

Fuck you and insults were first introduced by our friend, so fuck you for your abuse, loser.

Regards
DL

---

It’s more than slightly stupid of you to demand quotes from mainstream Christian theology, then to reject them when they’re provided.

Boru

Nothing was offered or rejected.

Mind your own business, stupid.

Regards
DL

You asked that Angrboda supply you with quotes that support her position. When she did so, you dismissed them and called them ‘garbage’.

Could we possibly build some sort of railing round you? Nothing elaborate, just as a warning to keep sensible people from getting too close.

Boru

[brewer]

Why does god put the needs of the few above the need of the many?

---

That moral tenet is about the only objective moral tenet I know of that has not been shown to ever be subjective. Yahweh seems to be doing the wrong thing.
 
We are told that most of us will end on the wide road to hell while the few end on the narrow path to heaven.
 
It is demonstrable that nature creates for the best possible end.
 
Why does Yahweh not follow the better rules he gave nature, and creates us for the worst possible end for the vast majority of us?
 
A decent father would not have the morals or ethics Yahweh seems to follow.
 
If true, then we end with more souls lost to Satan than souls saved by Yahweh. Even as scriptures say that Yahweh wills that all souls be saved.
 
God not getting his will is not allowed. God must always come out ahead. Something is not right for god.

---

 
Thoughts?
 
Regards
DL

God's an authoritarian capitalist, always has been. Read your bible!

[GrandizerII]

So Yahweh is horrible and all that. And? I fail to see how the Gnostic God is any better.