Posts: 367
Threads: 9
Joined: February 18, 2013
Reputation:
8
RE: Why can't science detect angels and demons?
March 1, 2013 at 6:08 am
In Hebrew, the word for dog can be broken into two words to mean "Like the heart" (כלב), meaning a creature of great devotion.
For cat, a slight stress change, and it means "Diaper".
Read into it what you may!
“I've done everything the Bible says — even the stuff that contradicts the other stuff!"— Ned Flanders
Posts: 30726
Threads: 2123
Joined: May 24, 2012
Reputation:
71
RE: Why can't science detect angels and demons?
March 1, 2013 at 10:19 am
If you have not heard of "The New Atheism" by Victor Stenger, it addresses the scope of what science can address, AND our common evolution on issues of morality and behavior.
Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
155
RE: Why can't science detect angels and demons?
March 1, 2013 at 1:48 pm
(March 1, 2013 at 5:37 am)Norfolk And Chance Wrote: Lets be clear here, dogs > cats.
Some dogs would like to believe in Ceiling Cat:
While not all cats do:
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
Posts: 1062
Threads: 9
Joined: March 1, 2013
Reputation:
6
RE: Why can't science detect angels and demons?
March 2, 2013 at 6:36 pm
You are not making a real argument. There are lot of things that science can't do. Like most atheists, you have a doctrinaire scientism. Why not ask yourself the things that science is unable to do.
Why don't you, before you post, next time, try and answer the question yourself. If you feel like you can answer it, you probably shouldn't post it, because you are just repeating lies and propaganda.