Not to mention her reason for changing the first name - because JESUS. That bitch's religion should not influence her judgement in court.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 17, 2024, 7:43 pm
Thread Rating:
Who's the greater wingnut? Parents or Judge?
|
Quote:"The word Messiah is a title and it's a title that has only been earned by one person and that one person is Jesus Christ," the judge said. Actually, the jews.... who are supposed to have invented the concept of a fucking messiah.....disagree. This Hay-Soos guy did nothing that a messiah is supposed to do.
At least they didn't name the boy Sue.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_rleFAS_B04 Johnny Cash was "da man" . The trouble with the world is not that people know too little, but that they know so many things that ain't so. -- Mark Twain . (August 12, 2013 at 12:07 pm)Drich Wrote: So? Since when does a judge have the right to rule on what he/she feels is right? They can only rule in accordance with how they interpret the law. I'd like to see what laws or precedence she cites that "messiah" is a title reserved only for Jesus. Besides, this was about the last name. But why do I have the feeling that if the judge had changed the name to "Obama" you'd be crying "judicial activism?"
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell
RE: Who's the greater wingnut? Parents or Judge?
August 12, 2013 at 2:18 pm
(This post was last modified: August 12, 2013 at 2:20 pm by fr0d0.)
"The judge [..] said the baby was to be named Martin DeShawn McCullough, which includes both parents' last name.
The boy's mother, Jaleesa Martin..." lolwhut!?
Wait... so she named him Martin to have the mother's last name? Where the he'll did they get those last names then?
(August 12, 2013 at 12:07 pm)Drich Wrote: If the judge has the authority to rule on a sir name based on what she believes to be right what law says she can not rule on a given name? Judges have the authority to rule on matters before the court. The matter of the child's first name was not something that the court was petitioned to rule on. In addition, judges are tasked with ruling on matters in accordance with statutory and case law, not according to their personal opinions, and certainly not according to their religious convictions. (August 12, 2013 at 2:39 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: In addition, judges are tasked with ruling on matters in accordance with statutory and case law, not according to their personal opinions, and certainly not according to their religious convictions. Not that I care, but the judge said she based her decision on the welfare of the child who would be living in a predominantly Christian area. As I hear on here how whacko you guys are over there this sounds like a good idea for the kid.
And she couldn't call him 'Jesus' because those fine xtians in Tennessee would think he was a fucking Mexican.
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)