I'm disturbed
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 16, 2024, 1:29 pm
Thread Rating:
Abortion not allowed
|
(October 6, 2014 at 4:22 pm)C4RM5 Wrote:(October 6, 2014 at 4:20 pm)vorlon13 Wrote: Without that first gasp of breath, the fetus is unensouled and NOT a living human being. Since I can't see where anyone has answered this for you & you obviously haven't read your holy book very well, here you go. Quote:Many people think that a human being is created at the time of conception but this belief is not supported by the bible. The fact that a living sperm penetrates a living ovum resulting in the formation of a living fetus does not mean that the fetus is a living human being. According to the bible, a fetus is not a living person with a soul until after drawing its first breath. Original here
"How is it that a lame man does not annoy us while a lame mind does? Because a lame man recognizes that we are walking straight, while a lame mind says that it is we who are limping." - Pascal
(October 13, 2014 at 1:29 pm)C4RM5 Wrote: Okay here you are, Nope these don't fly: In Psalm 139 the poet celebrates that God made him in the womb: "thou didst knit me together in my mother’s womb." It does not say that "I was a person before birth." We know humans form in the womb. Genesis 1:27 is rather famous but it has nothing to do with fetuses whatsoever: "So God created man in His own image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them. " Luke 18:16 Another well known verse: "But Jesus called them unto him, and said, Suffer little children to come unto me, and forbid them not: for of such is the kingdom of God." Yeah Jesus says he likes kids. Where's the fetus part? Jeremiah 1:5 is the first one that comes even remotely close. It says that god, who is omniscient chose Jeremiah as his prophet before Jeremiah was conceived: “Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, and before you were born I consecrated you; I appointed you a prophet to the nations.” That says to me that god is supposed to know who will be born before they are conceived. It does not say that they are people for purposes of thou shalt not kill before they are born. Galatians 1:15 "But when he who had set me apart before I was born, and had called me through his grace, 16 was pleased to reveal his Son to[c] me, in order that I might preach him among the Gentiles, I did not confer with flesh and blood, 17 nor did I go up to Jerusalem to those who were apostles before me, but I went away into Arabia; and again I returned to Damascus." This is Paul talking about how god chose him before he was born. It's just like Jeremiah in this and has nothing to do with whether fetus's are persons. Wait a minute! This one says that god does not consider fetuses people. But you do have to read the verse in context. It's one I cited in my post above: Exodus 21:22-24 "If men strive, and hurt a woman with child, so that her fruit depart from her, and yet no mischief follow: he shall be surely punished, according as the woman's husband will lay upon him; and he shall pay as the judges determine. And if any mischief follow, then thou shalt give life for life, Eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, Burning for burning, wound for wound, stripe for stripe." From it we learn: 1) It's wrong to hit a woman hard enough to cause her to miscarry and that those who do so should compensate the woman's husband for the loss of the fetus with money (hard to disagree with that except that it's the woman who ought to be compensated don't you think?); 2) that if you kill a woman you pay with your life; 3) if you permanently injure a woman you should be subject to a similar injury. Notice the big difference between how god treats the two cases. The woman is a person the fetus is not.
If there is a god, I want to believe that there is a god. If there is not a god, I want to believe that there is no god.
So you think it is right to have abortions because you quoted a book you don't think is accurate.
(October 13, 2014 at 2:10 pm)C4RM5 Wrote: So you think it is right to have abortions because you quoted a book you don't think is accurate. Are you really this intellectually limited or are you just dishonest? The argument is that you made a claim and it was disproved by your own standard of evidence.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Okay but towards the start I said from a non religious view I still think it is wrong.
RE: Abortion not allowed
October 13, 2014 at 2:16 pm
(This post was last modified: October 13, 2014 at 2:17 pm by Jenny A.)
(October 13, 2014 at 2:10 pm)C4RM5 Wrote: So you think it is right to have abortions because you quoted a book you don't think is accurate. No I think it is a right to have abortions during the first trimester because the fetus does not yet have anything approaching the cognitive functioning necessary for it to be considered human. You said the Bible prohibits abortion because fetuses are persons. You're wrong about that. In fact the Bible does not treat fetuses as persons. And you obviously haven't really read it with understanding.
If there is a god, I want to believe that there is a god. If there is not a god, I want to believe that there is no god.
(October 13, 2014 at 2:15 pm)C4RM5 Wrote: Okay but towards the start I said from a non religious view I still think it is wrong. You don't have a non-religious view.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
It does but you just want me to kill people.
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)