Posts: 3837
Threads: 197
Joined: August 28, 2013
Reputation:
38
RE: Scientific Debate: Why I assert that Darwin's theory of evolution is false
November 2, 2014 at 10:54 pm
(November 2, 2014 at 10:52 pm)Rob216 Wrote: I'm not a Christian but thanks for not not being prejudice (smh)
Well apologies, just bare in mind 90% of the people that come here saying stuff like that are christian. So which god flavor do you pick?
To-morrow, and to-morrow, and to-morrow,
Creeps in this petty pace from day to day,
To the last syllable of recorded time;
And all our yesterdays have lighted fools
The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle!
Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player,
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage,
And then is heard no more. It is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
Signifying nothing.
Posts: 448
Threads: 40
Joined: March 24, 2012
Reputation:
7
RE: Scientific Debate: Why I assert that Darwin's theory of evolution is false
November 2, 2014 at 11:45 pm
Evolutionists tell us we cannot see evolution taking place because it happens too slowly. A human generation takes about 20 years from birth to parenthood. They say it took tens of thousands of generations to form man from a common ancestor with the ape, from populations of only hundreds or thousands. We do not have these problems with bacteria. A new generation of bacteria grows in as short as 12 minutes or up to 24 hours or more, depending on the type of bacteria and the environment, but typically 20 minutes to a few hours. There are more bacteria in the world than there are grains of sand on all of the beaches of the world (and many grains of sand are covered with bacteria). They exist in just about any environment: hot, cold, dry, wet, high pressure, low pressure, small groups, large colonies, isolated, much food, little food, much oxygen, no oxygen, in toxic chemicals, etc.
There is much variation in bacteria. There are many mutations but they never turn into anything new. They always remain bacteria. Fruit flies are much more complex than already complex single-cell bacteria. In the lab, fruit flies are studied under every conceivable condition. There is much variation in fruit flies. There are many mutations. But they never turn into anything new. They always remain fruit flies. Many years of study of countless generations of bacteria and fruit flies all over the world shows that evolution is not happening today.
Posts: 11260
Threads: 61
Joined: January 5, 2013
Reputation:
123
RE: Scientific Debate: Why I assert that Darwin's theory of evolution is false
November 2, 2014 at 11:59 pm
(November 2, 2014 at 11:45 pm)Christian Wrote: Evolutionists tell us we cannot see evolution taking place because it happens too slowly. A human generation takes about 20 years from birth to parenthood. They say it took tens of thousands of generations to form man from a common ancestor with the ape, from populations of only hundreds or thousands. We do not have these problems with bacteria. A new generation of bacteria grows in as short as 12 minutes or up to 24 hours or more, depending on the type of bacteria and the environment, but typically 20 minutes to a few hours. There are more bacteria in the world than there are grains of sand on all of the beaches of the world (and many grains of sand are covered with bacteria). They exist in just about any environment: hot, cold, dry, wet, high pressure, low pressure, small groups, large colonies, isolated, much food, little food, much oxygen, no oxygen, in toxic chemicals, etc.
You're right. And do you know that it's been documented under laboratory conditions that a colony of bacteria can evolve the ability to digest nylon, a material that did not exist in any form before 1935?
Quote:There is much variation in bacteria. There are many mutations but they never turn into anything new. They always remain bacteria. Fruit flies are much more complex than already complex single-cell bacteria. In the lab, fruit flies are studied under every conceivable condition. There is much variation in fruit flies. There are many mutations. But they never turn into anything new. They always remain fruit flies. Many years of study of countless generations of bacteria and fruit flies all over the world shows that evolution is not happening today.
The problem you're having is in thinking that this is just a matter of generations, that after X number of generations a new species will automatically be generated. This is untrue; the arrival of new species is based on the selection pressures facing a given organism, as well as time. In the case of bacteria and fruit flies, they are well settled into their ecological niches to such a degree that there isn't a requirement for rapid change merely to survive. You can see the same thing, by the way, with sharks; given that they are apex predators, they don't have the same kind of selection pressures that other species have to deal with.
That said, evolution has never just been about the generation of new species. In actuality, evolution is genetic change over successive generations in a population of organisms, which is easily demonstrable, such as in the nylon-digestion example I gave earlier, and many others. The fact that you didn't actually know what evolution was before you saw fit to talk about it speaks volumes about your willingness to approach this topic honestly, and with anything other than your knee-jerk, thoughtless creationist distortions.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Posts: 15351
Threads: 118
Joined: January 13, 2014
Reputation:
117
RE: Scientific Debate: Why I assert that Darwin's theory of evolution is false
November 3, 2014 at 12:05 am
Christian, really, you should learn about what something is before you argue against it.
Nothing in the entire library of knowledge about evolution would point to an idea that a species or organism must evolve into some new, wildly different organism over time.
Bacteria have shown to evolve new abilities that weren't there before. The very fact that there are so many different species of bacteria is proof of evolution. Bacteria are extremely good at what they do. They are remarkable in their ability to adapt to new environments and metabolize different substances. If an organism is highly adaptable and suited to many different environments, you wouldn't expect it to speciate, would you? If it is doing well in it's environment, wouldn't there be more deleterious mutations?
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
Posts: 55
Threads: 2
Joined: November 1, 2014
Reputation:
5
RE: Scientific Debate: Why I assert that Darwin's theory of evolution is false
November 3, 2014 at 12:05 am
@ Lemonvariable72 Yea I'm not going there. The last time I gave out information about myself someone used it to attack me on a personal level. I get that we all have the ability to hide behind computer screens on here but if that person had said what they said in person there would have been problems, and I have a very laid back personality. Besides, I hate religion so I couldn't really put it into a category anyways. ($10 says someone will quote this and use it to bash me)
"My life has taught me that true spiritual insight can come about only through direct experience, the way a severe burn can be attained only by putting your hand in the fire. Faith is nothing more than a watered-down attempt to accept someone else's insight as your own." -Damien Echols
Posts: 2281
Threads: 16
Joined: January 17, 2010
Reputation:
69
RE: Scientific Debate: Why I assert that Darwin's theory of evolution is false
November 3, 2014 at 12:37 am
Sum ergo sum
Posts: 18510
Threads: 129
Joined: January 19, 2014
Reputation:
91
RE: Scientific Debate: Why I assert that Darwin's theory of evolution is false
November 3, 2014 at 3:42 am
(November 3, 2014 at 12:05 am)Rob216 Wrote: @Lemonvariable72 Yea I'm not going there. The last time I gave out information about myself someone used it to attack me on a personal level. I get that we all have the ability to hide behind computer screens on here but if that person had said what they said in person there would have been problems, and I have a very laid back personality. Besides, I hate religion so I couldn't really put it into a category anyways. ($10 says someone will quote this and use it to bash me)
Well, then hang around a bit and after a while, you'll know whether you feel comfortable to share more. What is supposed to be used to bash you? That you hate religion? HYPOCRITE! Now give me my 10 bucks!
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
Posts: 55
Threads: 2
Joined: November 1, 2014
Reputation:
5
RE: Scientific Debate: Why I assert that Darwin's theory of evolution is false
November 3, 2014 at 4:10 am
Ok that actually made me laugh out loud
"My life has taught me that true spiritual insight can come about only through direct experience, the way a severe burn can be attained only by putting your hand in the fire. Faith is nothing more than a watered-down attempt to accept someone else's insight as your own." -Damien Echols
Posts: 19561
Threads: 177
Joined: July 31, 2012
Reputation:
92
RE: Scientific Debate: Why I assert that Darwin's theory of evolution is false
November 3, 2014 at 5:00 am
(November 3, 2014 at 12:05 am)Rob216 Wrote: @Lemonvariable72 Yea I'm not going there. The last time I gave out information about myself someone used it to attack me on a personal level. I get that we all have the ability to hide behind computer screens on here but if that person had said what they said in person there would have been problems, and I have a very laid back personality. Besides, I hate religion so I couldn't really put it into a category anyways. ($10 says someone will quote this and use it to bash me)
I bash thee against the stones, like a child of some conquered people, in accordance with the instructions of the god of the conquerors!
Easiest $10!
Posts: 18510
Threads: 129
Joined: January 19, 2014
Reputation:
91
RE: Scientific Debate: Why I assert that Darwin's theory of evolution is false
November 3, 2014 at 5:08 am
(This post was last modified: November 3, 2014 at 5:10 am by Alex K.)
(November 3, 2014 at 4:10 am)Rob216 Wrote: Ok that actually made me laugh out loud
But seriously, being a believer and rejecting organized religion sounds more reasonable than following a church. In the case of christianity they are so far away in spirit from what the Jesus figure says, it's not even funny. But of course, the holy books are also man made fabrications, so if you must believe in God(s), I guess it's best to invent your own faith. Just be skeptical if you think you are receiving instructions or opinions from that god, whether it's not your prejudice speaking.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
|
