Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 20, 2024, 12:10 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Trinity Explained
#41
RE: The Trinity Explained
Quote:If you picure it like a person, God the Father would be from the neck up. God the Son would be from the neck down left side. God the Spirit would be from the neck down right side.


Hey, tack.... could you point me to the line in the bible that contains that little holy anatomy lesson?
Reply
#42
RE: The Trinity Explained
(September 30, 2010 at 11:48 am)tackattack Wrote: To use your analogy of the conjoined twins, yes we can seperate them surgically and indeed have truly seperate entitis, butin realit don't conjoined twins share the same dna and fingerprints?

1. All identical twins share the same DNA.
2. No, conjoined twins don't share the same fingerprints.

http://multiples.about.com/cs/funfacts/a...rprint.htm

I don't understand your analogy here. Conjoined twins are still regarded as two separate entities.

(September 30, 2010 at 11:48 am)tackattack Wrote: Can one be in Oklahoma and another go to Virginia? By design they move as one.

And...the ability to move away from one another is evidence of what?

(September 30, 2010 at 11:48 am)tackattack Wrote: By design tehy're made of one substance.

1. It is by a defect in the pregnancy that they share a similar structure.
2. All identical twins are made of one "substance".

(September 30, 2010 at 11:48 am)tackattack Wrote: Can you not see a conjoined twin walk down the street and accuratly say he's walking down the street or they are walking down the street. Wouldn't both be accurate.

No, because a twin implies two people - that's kind of the point. It's not a person with two heads, it's two people sharing one body. Completely different concept. Not only that, you can demonstrate that the entities that encompass this body are indeed different from one another, both physically and reasonably.

(September 30, 2010 at 11:48 am)tackattack Wrote: One the singular object in it's entirey or multiple each individual personality? By action their purposes and wills are different therefore they can interact with us in different ways.

..and here you are again referring to "them" as separate entities. You can't have your cake and eat it too. If you want to say they're part of a collective, so be it, but don't then go and say they're the same thing. I can say Superman and Wonderwoman are part of the Superfriends, but it would be foolish of me to say that they're not separate entities, and the fact that they're connected with a common goal somehow means that Superman is indeed Wonderwoman.

(September 30, 2010 at 11:48 am)tackattack Wrote: Jesus took human form. The Spirit resides within us. God resides in Heaven.

So people pray to all three. Please tell me how this isn't worshiping 3 gods - all with their own will and mind?

(September 30, 2010 at 11:48 am)tackattack Wrote: To answer your question he sacrificed himself for us by going through the trials and tribulations in human form. There is no sacrificing to. It would be like saying " I sacrificed some of my time to help the homeless" Who are you sacrificing to? No one really, just another way of saying giving something up to get something done.

When I give my time to the homeless, the time is not a sacrifice. It is not a noun, as it is intangible. It isn't an offering to a deity, it's a representation of efforts made to help people in a reasonable way. Jesus, like other blood sacrifices, was the sacrifice.

Keeping the blood clean for sacrifice to his father:

John 20:17
"Jesus saith unto her, Touch me not; for I am not yet ascended to my Father - but go to my brethren, and say unto them, I ascend unto my Father, and your Father; and to my God, and your God."

Comparing it to animal sacrifice:

Hebrews 9:12
"Neither by the blood of goats and calves, but by his own blood he entered in once into the holy place, having obtained eternal redemption for us."


Referring to God and Jesus separately, and the blood sacrifice to God - Christ.

Hebrews 9:24-26
"For Christ is not entered into the holy places made with hands, which are the figures of the true; but into heaven itself, now to appear in the presence of God for us: Nor yet that he should offer himself often, as the high priest entereth into the holy place every year with blood of others; For then must he often have suffered since the foundation of the world: but now ONCE in the end of the world hath he appeared to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself."

Christ buying our sins back from God with his blood sacrifice, also referring to the Holy Ghost as a separate entity from God and Christ.

Acts 20:28
"Take heed therefore unto yourselves, and to all the flock, over the which the Holy Ghost hath made you overseers, to feed the church of God, which he hath purchased with his own blood"


Reply
#43
RE: The Trinity Explained
(September 30, 2010 at 2:06 pm)tavarish Wrote:

@tav-
2-In regards to my analogy; I perhaps used the incorrect word and I apologize. I was talking about conjoined twins

while they most assuredly share a physical connection, which you are simply dismissing and treating them like this

and you are grossly over analyzing the analogy, in this analogy and can be considered one entity. Perhaps the twins aren't phenomenologically identical, but genetically they are one. Phenotypes requires physical interaction with a physical environment and God is metaphysical in nature. I was simply trying to explain how they are one substance, like the conjoined twins are one continuous connected human form. They also have knowledge of each other intimately. They also share similar qualities, like a conjoined twins genetics, but have differences like the phenotype of a conjoined twin. I hope you can get the analogy now that we've over analyzed it to death.
2-As far as people worshiping all three. Jesus points people to worship God

and the Holy spirit points us towards God


So I don't know why anyone is "worshiping" anyone but God. They might be speaking of or to someone other than God out of habit or teaching, but the worship is only the singular God.

3-As far as time not being a noun and therefore not qualifying as being able to be sacrificed, get real??!? Do I really need to pull out a dictionary here. It most assuredly is a noun and a common enough colloquialism to say you're "sacrificing you time" for your art or whatever purpose you have. You're right sacrificing time isn't an offering to a deity but it is a sacrifice. There fore you can hopefully see where the analogy I'm using is appropriate to my points listed as to why Jesus isn't sacrificing any part of him to another part of the Godhead, but he is doing a great sacrifice.



@min- I'd link the site but you're trying to liberalize my analogy and then prove it untrue because it's not scriptural based. As some of the verses quoted (And there are plenty of better one, but not what you're looking for I'm afraid) by tav shows above they're 3 separate entities worshiped as one God.
"There ought to be a term that would designate those who actually follow the teachings of Jesus, since the word 'Christian' has been largely divorced from those teachings, and so polluted by fundamentalists that it has come to connote their polar opposite: intolerance, vindictive hatred, and bigotry." -- Philip Stater, Huffington Post

always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
Reply
#44
RE: The Trinity Explained
(September 30, 2010 at 1:06 am)DeistPaladin Wrote:
(September 29, 2010 at 11:51 pm)Godschild Wrote: First Christ gave His life for us, He sacrificed Himself for us, His sacrifice was not made to the Father so God did not sacrifice Himself to Himself.

When you make an animal sacrifice to appease the gods (or Yahweh) for your sins, the animal isn't being sacrificed to the priest. The animal is (theoretically) being sacrificed to the gods to appease their wrath.

In cultures that offered human sacrifices to appease the gods, the human isn't dying for the community, even though the are theoretically the beneficiaries. The human is being sacrificed to the gods.

Jesus was essentially to be the penultimate sacrifice for sins, to appease the wrath of Yahweh and pave the way for our salvation (theoretically). He replaced the need for animal sacrifices as he performed that very role. He was sacrificed to Yahweh, as the previous animals were. You can't use the fact that we are (theoretically) the beneficiaries to obfuscate the issue. Yahweh is who he was sacrificed to.

But he IS Yahweh, and so he is sacrificing himself to himself in order to convince himself to forgive us.

Clear?

No that is not clear show me Bibically that you are correct.
God loves those who believe and those who do not and the same goes for me, you have no choice in this matter. That puts the matter of total free will to rest.
Reply
#45
RE: The Trinity Explained
(October 1, 2010 at 12:09 am)Godschild Wrote: No that is not clear show me Bibically that you are correct.

Well, help me out then. Tell me what part isn't clear and I'll give you the passage to review.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
...      -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
...       -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
Reply
#46
RE: The Trinity Explained
(September 30, 2010 at 10:49 am)tavarish Wrote:
(September 28, 2010 at 1:46 pm)tackattack Wrote: @TOO- He did sacrifice part of himself.

tavarish Wrote:To what did he sacrifice part of himself?

This is what I mean by you guys take things from TV and try to apply it to God and it want work. Christ sacrificed Himself for us to cover our sins Christ could have only sacrificed Himself to God if He had done something wrong.

(September 28, 2010 at 1:46 pm)tackattack Wrote: If you picure it like a person, God the Father would be from the neck up. God the Son would be from the neck down left side. God the Spirit would be from the neck down right side.

tavarish Wrote:...so God has no control over the son and the holy spirit? Do any of them have control over each other?


You should read the Bible verses that I posted the answer is there. They are of one mind they have the same attributes they are three entities that share one common goal. That goal is to glorify God, I know you do not understand this concept but it is what it is. They do not control each other they work as one.



(September 30, 2010 at 1:06 am)DeistPaladin Wrote: [quote='Godschild' pid='96579' dateline='1285818704']
First Christ gave His life for us, He sacrificed Himself for us, His sacrifice was not made to the Father so God did not sacrifice Himself to Himself.

When you make an animal sacrifice to appease the gods (or Yahweh) for your sins, the animal isn't being sacrificed to the priest. The animal is (theoretically) being sacrificed to the gods to appease their wrath.

In cultures that offered human sacrifices to appease the gods, the human isn't dying for the community, even though the are theoretically the beneficiaries. The human is being sacrificed to the gods.

Jesus was essentially to be the penultimate sacrifice for sins, to appease the wrath of Yahweh and pave the way for our salvation (theoretically). He replaced the need for animal sacrifices as he performed that very role. He was sacrificed to Yahweh, as the previous animals were. You can't use the fact that we are (theoretically) the beneficiaries to obfuscate the issue. Yahweh is who he was sacrificed to.

But he IS Yahweh, and so he is sacrificing himself to himself in order to convince himself to forgive us.


Clear?

What I put in bold.
God loves those who believe and those who do not and the same goes for me, you have no choice in this matter. That puts the matter of total free will to rest.
Reply
#47
RE: The Trinity Explained
Quote:@min- I'd link the site but you're trying to liberalize my analogy and then prove it untrue because it's not scriptural based.


Oh no, tack. You know me. I think the "scriptures" are absolute bullshit from the word go. However, since it is you guys who inform us that all of this stuff is in there I just wondered if you had a source for that one.

Frankly, even if it was in "scriptures" that would not save it from being bullshit.


Some things cannot be saved.
Reply
#48
RE: The Trinity Explained
(September 30, 2010 at 1:06 am)DeistPaladin Wrote: [...]But he IS Yahweh, and so he is sacrificing himself to himself in order to convince himself to forgive us.

Clear?

That's right folks: Even God can suffer from schizophrenia!
Reply
#49
RE: The Trinity Explained
(October 1, 2010 at 7:08 am)EvidenceVsFaith Wrote: That's right folks: Even God can suffer from schizophrenia!
That would actually explain a lot .... if he/she/it was real to start with.

"How is it that a lame man does not annoy us while a lame mind does? Because a lame man recognizes that we are walking straight, while a lame mind says that it is we who are limping." - Pascal
Reply
#50
RE: The Trinity Explained

(September 30, 2010 at 5:14 pm)tackattack Wrote: 2-In regards to my analogy; I perhaps used the incorrect word and I apologize. I was talking about conjoined twins

while they most assuredly share a physical connection, which you are simply dismissing and treating them like this

and you are grossly over analyzing the analogy, in this analogy and can be considered one entity.

So let's try to make sense of this, because you're still trying to tell me an apple is an orange.

You're using conjoined twins, two people attached to each other - forming a body and comparing that to a concept of 3 invisible and unverifiable entities - and making the point that 3 = 1.

I'm not saying conjoined twins don't share a physical body, but what I am saying is that they're regarded as different entities. They have different names, have their own wills, fears, emotions and dreams. They even have different fingerprints.

If we're speaking in terms of entities, which we are, then conjoined twins are just as separate as identical twins. However, what I think you're doing is trying to make the point that their physical connection is analogous to your God's connection with the other 2, which doesn't follow in the least - since one is about sharing a physical connection, and another is strictly conceptual and has nothing to do with physical reality.

In any case, ALL of the parties are separate entities, much like my Superfriends analogy. Yes, they serve a common goal, but there are distinguishing characteristics between them, not to mention a will and mind of their own, by your own admission.

(September 30, 2010 at 5:14 pm)tackattack Wrote: Perhaps the twins aren't phenomenologically identical, but genetically they are one.

And so are identical twins. On that basis, can you refer to them as one entity? If I clone 100 sheep with the same genetic material, will I have only one sheep?

(September 30, 2010 at 5:14 pm)tackattack Wrote: Phenotypes requires physical interaction with a physical environment and God is metaphysical in nature.

So you understand how your analogy does not apply.

(September 30, 2010 at 5:14 pm)tackattack Wrote: I was simply trying to explain how they are one substance, like the conjoined twins are one continuous connected human form.

Yes, but they are still separate entities, as they have minds and wills independent of their sibling.
(September 30, 2010 at 5:14 pm)tackattack Wrote: They also have knowledge of each other intimately.

And? What does this have to do with justifying 3=1?

(September 30, 2010 at 5:14 pm)tackattack Wrote: They also share similar qualities, like a conjoined twins genetics, but have differences like the phenotype of a conjoined twin. I hope you can get the analogy now that we've over analyzed it to death.

I hope you can get how the analogy doesn't make sense and isn't applicable to an erroneous concept. Sharing similar qualities, yet being different is demonstrating that they are different entities. I don't know how much clearer I can make it.

(September 30, 2010 at 5:14 pm)tackattack Wrote: 2-As far as people worshiping all three. Jesus points people to worship God

and the Holy spirit points us towards God


So I don't know why anyone is "worshiping" anyone but God. They might be speaking of or to someone other than God out of habit or teaching, but the worship is only the singular God.

What?!

Jesus talking about praying to him:

John 14:14
If you ask Me anything in My name, I will do it.

Praying to God:

Matthew 6:9
This, then, is how you should pray:
" 'Our Father in heaven,
hallowed be your name,


Praying to the Holy Spirit:

Romans 8:26
In the same way, the Spirit helps us in our weakness. We do not know what we ought to pray for, but the Spirit himself intercedes for us with groans that words cannot express.

Jude 20:
But you, dear friends, build yourselves up in your most holy faith and pray in the Holy Spirit.

On the all 3 as separate entities:

John 15:26
“When the Helper comes, whom I will send to you from the Father, that is the Spirit of truth who proceeds from the Father, He will testify about Me"


Are we still trying to prove Homer Simpson is Barney Gumble because they're both on the Simpsons?


(September 30, 2010 at 5:14 pm)tackattack Wrote: 3-As far as time not being a noun and therefore not qualifying as being able to be sacrificed, get real??!? Do I really need to pull out a dictionary here. It most assuredly is a noun and a common enough colloquialism to say you're "sacrificing you time" for your art or whatever purpose you have.

Do you realize that an intangible sacrifice, such as effort, is much different than a tangible one, like an animal or human? It paints a vastly different picture, not to mention the sacrifice was to purchase the sin incurred by man. Please do explain, who was selling it?

(September 30, 2010 at 5:14 pm)tackattack Wrote: You're right sacrificing time isn't an offering to a deity but it is a sacrifice. There fore you can hopefully see where the analogy I'm using is appropriate to my points listed as to why Jesus isn't sacrificing any part of him to another part of the Godhead, but he is doing a great sacrifice.

I don't understand how your analogy stands. Jesus died so he could exploit a loophole in God's rulebook because things were getting out of hand. He did it to appease the system that God implemented.

Man sins, and is destined for hell by God. Jesus offers himself as collateral for man's sins.
How is this not an offering to a deity?



Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  [Serious] The Trinity zwanzig 127 10715 January 23, 2021 at 10:31 pm
Last Post: arewethereyet
  Refuting trinity. Mystic 35 6378 April 8, 2018 at 2:15 pm
Last Post: JackRussell
  The Trinity Doctrine: Help me out, Christians GrandizerII 169 23471 February 9, 2018 at 8:48 pm
Last Post: Amarok
  The Trinity and Mary vorlon13 52 16099 May 30, 2017 at 12:28 pm
Last Post: Lek
  Purgatory Explained? Janice_Spokes 27 3645 May 23, 2016 at 10:47 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  10 apologist mistakes about trinity Mystic 21 4766 April 2, 2016 at 5:34 pm
Last Post: athrock
  Where Did The Trinity Teaching Come From? Alter2Ego 13 4992 March 17, 2014 at 1:20 pm
Last Post: Tonus
  Trinity old man 133 45884 September 19, 2013 at 4:52 pm
Last Post: Cyberman
  The trinity Drich 246 104218 June 11, 2012 at 2:26 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Where Did the Trinity Teaching Come From? Alter2Ego 80 35860 June 6, 2012 at 12:13 pm
Last Post: parabola



Users browsing this thread: 12 Guest(s)