Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 10, 2026, 5:04 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
How to debunk the first cause argument without trying too hard
#13
RE: How to debunk the first cause argument without trying too hard
(July 22, 2015 at 8:13 pm)Dystopia Wrote: TL;DR -----> If god doesn't need a cause then why the fuck does the universe need one? Answer - Special pleading.

The apologist method of dealing with this problem was to change the argument (as MysticKnight noted) from "everything that exists" to "everything that begins to exist." It's still special pleading, IMO; they've simply baked it into the premise, trying to pretend that if they do it that way then the charge of special pleading doesn't apply. But even putting that aside, they need to show that god did not have a beginning. This is where you go down the circular logic path ("the Holy Book says so, and the Holy Book was written by god, and we know it was because the Holy Book says so...").

Nor does the argument rule out a natural cause. And our history is one where such questions always wind up having a natural explanation and not a supernatural one. So it's reasonable to expect there to be a natural explanation for the existence of the universe. It is unreasonable to expect there to be a supernatural one.
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."

-Stephen Jay Gould
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: How to debunk the first cause argument without trying too hard - by Tonus - July 23, 2015 at 7:10 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The Kalam Cosmological argument. JJoseph 113 26723 January 10, 2024 at 12:38 am
Last Post: Astreja
  A 21st Century Ontological Argument: does it work. JJoseph 23 6789 January 9, 2024 at 8:10 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Mike Litorus owns god without any verses no one 3 1522 July 9, 2023 at 7:13 pm
Last Post: brewer
  Conscience and the Moral Argument as Evidence for the Goodness of God. Nishant Xavier 162 38588 July 9, 2023 at 7:53 am
Last Post: Deesse23
  Is the Argument from Degrees contradictory to the 3rd Law of Thermodynamics? FlatAssembler 49 11387 June 26, 2023 at 6:59 pm
Last Post: Belacqua
  Is my argument against afterlife an equivocation fallacy? FlatAssembler 61 14535 June 20, 2023 at 5:59 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  A simple argument against God Disagreeable 149 40668 December 29, 2022 at 11:59 am
Last Post: Mister Agenda
  The world's first scientist LinuxGal 8 2842 October 31, 2022 at 6:47 am
Last Post: Jehanne
  My Almighty VS your argument against it Won2blv 43 11235 May 5, 2022 at 9:13 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  A "meta-argument" against all future arguments for God's existence ? R00tKiT 225 60193 April 17, 2022 at 2:11 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)