(July 23, 2015 at 3:13 pm)Esquilax Wrote: That's a fallacy of composition: the temporal framework you're seeking to apply is a condition that is only necessarily true within the universe, you can't extrapolate outward so that it's true outside of the universe. In fact, given the connection of space and time, what we know about the origins of our current expansionary universe denotes a highly different configuration of space, and thus the same is true for time. The odds are actually against the fallacy you're making anyway, even if we just ignore the flaw in the logic and treat it as a serious contention.It works to everything that is in state of change from one state to another.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 7, 2025, 6:11 pm
Thread Rating:
How to debunk the first cause argument without trying too hard
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)