(August 6, 2015 at 2:59 pm)Esquilax Wrote: [quote='ChadWooters' pid='1015400' dateline='1438887235']Good luck with that **sarcasm** I'm quite sure all your objections will be straw men based on modern misunderstandings of Classical philosophy. All of the sort Metis, the great and mighty Divinity Student, plagiarized from some dopey blog writer who clearly never actually read Aquinas.
You can find the rational steps by which you get from the Unmoved Mover/First Cause/Necessary in my opening statement in the debate area (ChadWooters versus Metis, “Resolved: Using the ‘Five Ways’ found in Article 1, Question 2 of the Summa Theological, Thomas Aquinas successfully demonstrates the existence of God.”)
http://atheistforums.org/thread-34889-po...1007461I'm writing a blog post about the huge, conspicuous leaps that arguments like the five ways use to get to god out of nowhere.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 6, 2025, 9:10 am
Thread Rating:
How to debunk the first cause argument without trying too hard
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)