(October 7, 2015 at 10:09 am)ChadWooters Wrote: Seems to me that people do not always agree on basic material facts of history, crime scenes, and even scientific findings. But few people would say that obectivity is impossible in those areas. To say that for morality to be objective the facts must be incontrovertible strains the definition of objectivity. Why should anyone assume that moral knowledge cannot be objective just because people lack full understanding of the area of inquiry?
True, but people who claim something exists without being able to demonstrate that it exists are usually full of shit.
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)