(March 3, 2016 at 12:24 pm)Drich Wrote: with this level of pomp and presumption you would think you would be able to bring some next level discussion to the table. but no you answer you own question (sort of) with this mess:Well you know that with pomp and presumption, there's never any real material.
Quote:Oh, but Adam sinned, and then god walked away, but that was after god decided to create the sun, so why would he do that then? If god has turned away, then how can he still be omnipresent in our universe? Oh, but never mind that, because god already explained to Moses that if he showed him his glorious face, it would kill the little humans.
So god's light kills animals, but plants don't dry up and die in it? You do have a very complex web of excuses to fill every crack, crevass and ravine in your arguments...very impressive (not)!
As for you, there are very good reasons why we call you Drippy, see below:
Quote:You do understand God is a title and not a name?
As In God the Father
God the Son
God the Holy Spirit
Correct???
As such the three unique deities that make up the one God, have different aspects to them. They are not the same being.
Did you also know the radiance of God was called by the Jews The "Shikinna Glory" of God. The Shikinna radiates from the Father and even those who have been in the presents of the Father. This is the same super bright Radiant light described in the Book of Revelation that surrounds the city of Heaven. No sun, no stars in Genesis 1:1 means the Light produced that first Day radiated From the Father.
After the 6th Day God the Father/creator stepped back. It says this clearly in the text of genesis 1. So what then is your objection? Or are you arguing something you have not even bothered to read?
Mr. Hanky loves you!