RE: People this isn't hard…
April 10, 2016 at 4:18 am
(This post was last modified: April 10, 2016 at 4:21 am by Goosebump.
Edit Reason: though doesn't have a T at the end, if it did it would be a good thought
)
(April 10, 2016 at 3:44 am)BrokenQuill92 Wrote:(April 10, 2016 at 3:38 am)Alex K Wrote: "No mentally ill people" is a very problematic generalization though. Where do you draw the line, and which mental illnesses count?
It may seem harsh but my safety (and their own safety) comes before the feelings of any mentally ill person. And since I have no idea how exactly a persons' mental illness will manifest itself I would feel safer with a blanket ban. That's just me personally.
How do you quantify it though? National database of everybody with a mental illness? Good idea, costs though. What about those undiagnosed? Back to the logistical problem with your 1.
Short of a national database of everybody's mental status I think you'll have a hard time getting this fully implemented. /s
"I'm thick." - Me
