(June 28, 2016 at 6:36 pm)KevinM1 Wrote:(June 28, 2016 at 6:29 pm)SteveII Wrote: You have already admitted to being fine with your circular reasoning. Where would I start with someone who does not want/need to be logical. In case it went over your head, here it is again:
1. There is no evidence for God (i.e. supernatural events)
2. The NT does not count because of supernatural events
3. Therefore there is no evidence for God.
Nope, not circular. Again, the NT is the/collection of claims. They're a highly biased source that cannot be taken as evidence for what it's selling. Try again.
Because you repeat it over and over does not change anything. The argument above is circular and plain stupid.
Since when isn't eyewitness testimony evidence? Peter, James and John are eyewitnesses. You also have not answered my objection that the churches predate the epistles and the gospels and they believed the events happened. That belief was based on eyewitness testimony too.
