(July 10, 2016 at 2:13 pm)A Theist Wrote:(July 10, 2016 at 1:58 pm)Losty Wrote: And you're dishonest. That was obviously sarcasm.
This is @A Theist, not BQ
No it wasn't. He was actually being dishonest. He emboldened part of a reply that I made to Homeless Nutter after he suggested that the cops should shoot a couple of white guys and maybe a woman or two, to please the egalitarians. He also said,
Quote:The bolded bit is a very telling comment, indicating that we should like or dislike people based on their melanin content.I made no such comment and I didn't indicate anything like that. He was dishonest in his response.
What homeless nutter said was clear and obvious sarcasm. If you want to respond to sarcasm by insinuating that the person who used it hates white people then you have no business being upset by anyone who responds to your disingenuous post by calling you a racist. No reasonable person would have looked at HN's post and thought he was genuinely being racist against white people, Hillary.
