RE: ???? Is No one going to mention the nose dive clinton took at ground zero?
September 13, 2016 at 1:25 pm
(This post was last modified: September 13, 2016 at 1:40 pm by ReptilianPeon.)
Q:
A: The sensible people do. Unfortunately many supporters of both Donald and Hilary are sheep. For example, what are Hilary's top five, let's say, achievements as Secretary of State? Sounds to me like spent the entire time writing e-mails about Yoga and wedding planning. And yet she's supposed to be this amazing competent individual who we should bow our heads in prostration to.
Same with Donald. I don't hesitate to say he's an awful business person. But people voted for him because they are ill-informed. The electorate is also angry at establishment figures like Hilary, I will grant you that, and some people just want to see the whole thing crumble with Donald as president.
Q:
A: The media plays a big role in this. The news media in particular hesitates to talk about policy substance. And they don't like to press the main candidates on issues. In my opinion, there are two serious candidates for the Oval Office:
1. Gary Johnson
2. Jill Stein
Hilary and Donald are both embarrassments. The voters in the respective primaries should be ashamed of themselves. The media played a role too, because they want the ratings, but it is also up to the voters to investigate the candidates for themselves. In our Internet Age it's easier than ever before to see who is lying and who isn't. And consider this, Donald used to want more than two people in the presidential debates and now he's not really talking about such things:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RpUH2OiiYec
Q:
A: Hilary only wanted the FBI to think she is a retard so she could get away with her crimes. She's actually rather smart. After all, she constantly wriggles out of scandals that would end the political careers of anybody else. A lot like Donald, actually.
Anybody else who did what she did would be in jail. Being investigated by the FBI used to be a disqualifier for the presidency but people still voted for her, and now she has set a precedent. Hilary is a very good liar and she loves using Orwellian language.
Q:
A: I think those issues have, especially amoungst Millennials, had an effect. Millennials tend not to watch cooperate TV media. They are so many media personalities who claim to be "left-wing" or "liberal" or "progressive" and yet they slandered Bernie in the primaries and they slander Jill Stein today. These people aren't liberal. They are corperatist sheep.
The four way polling shows Gary and Jill taking slightly more away form Hilary than Donald. Most of the Republicans that aren't extreme nationalists or Fascists (especially those who like politicians such as Rand and Ron Paul), I would imagine, will be voting for Gary Johnson. Some of the hardcore Ted Cruz supports may vote for Darrell Castle of the Constitution Party (where they can as they currently have access to 276 electoral votes - so in theory Darrell could become president).
If Hilary loses it will be the fault of the DNC, Debbie Do-Anything-For-Hilary and Hilary herself. The DNC has sadly given weight to Donald's claims of a "rigged system" and if Hilary wins he will justified in being suspicious of the result given how easy it is to hack voting machines. If left-wing voters aren't convinced by Hilary (maybe because she's ignoring them and rushing to appease the sorts of people who actually like Jeb Bush) there's no law saying they have to vote for her, and I believe Donald in the Oval Office will result fewer deaths of American soldiers in pointless wars.
Q:
If it's just Pneumonia then it is a non-issue because that alone isn't enough to make her unfit for the Oval Office. I personally think she has Parkinson's, based on what the Parkinson's Foundation (and others) lists as symptoms. But even if we assume I'm right, early Parkinson's isn't enough either. If Hilary's health does become an issue then the Twenty-fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution will come into play and the vice president takes over.
She lied about her health and that is my issue. If she's hiding any other health problems, like I say the twenty-fifty Amendment will kick in and stop her from doing any more damage to the country, and indeed the world. And I'm pretty sure Donald did too when he had they "astonishingly excellent" doctor's note written so I'm sure he's lying too. Donald Trump will not be the healthiest president ever. Gary Johnson might be though, because he's both a marathon runner and a mountain climber - if I remember rightly.
(September 13, 2016 at 11:26 am)Drich Wrote: Do you think the whole voting populace looks to substantive topical or timely issues to determine a candidate's worthiness to hold the office of POTUS?
A: The sensible people do. Unfortunately many supporters of both Donald and Hilary are sheep. For example, what are Hilary's top five, let's say, achievements as Secretary of State? Sounds to me like spent the entire time writing e-mails about Yoga and wedding planning. And yet she's supposed to be this amazing competent individual who we should bow our heads in prostration to.
Same with Donald. I don't hesitate to say he's an awful business person. But people voted for him because they are ill-informed. The electorate is also angry at establishment figures like Hilary, I will grant you that, and some people just want to see the whole thing crumble with Donald as president.
Q:
Quote:Can the electoral process be more accurately compared to a popularity contest? Popularity based on what if not on some surface value attribute that a voter happens to identify with or simply like?
A: The media plays a big role in this. The news media in particular hesitates to talk about policy substance. And they don't like to press the main candidates on issues. In my opinion, there are two serious candidates for the Oval Office:
1. Gary Johnson
2. Jill Stein
Hilary and Donald are both embarrassments. The voters in the respective primaries should be ashamed of themselves. The media played a role too, because they want the ratings, but it is also up to the voters to investigate the candidates for themselves. In our Internet Age it's easier than ever before to see who is lying and who isn't. And consider this, Donald used to want more than two people in the presidential debates and now he's not really talking about such things:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RpUH2OiiYec
Q:
Quote:Now what happens when that popular person's physical or mental well being is called into question? does that identfiable attribute remain or is it dimished in anyway? If so is does it change the want to vote for this person?
A: Hilary only wanted the FBI to think she is a retard so she could get away with her crimes. She's actually rather smart. After all, she constantly wriggles out of scandals that would end the political careers of anybody else. A lot like Donald, actually.
Anybody else who did what she did would be in jail. Being investigated by the FBI used to be a disqualifier for the presidency but people still voted for her, and now she has set a precedent. Hilary is a very good liar and she loves using Orwellian language.
Q:
Quote:Now ask yourself honestly, has it made a dent in the hardcore never trump-eters? has it put any of them on their heels? or do they just buckle down and hang on to some 'faith' that their canidate is better than trump?
A: I think those issues have, especially amoungst Millennials, had an effect. Millennials tend not to watch cooperate TV media. They are so many media personalities who claim to be "left-wing" or "liberal" or "progressive" and yet they slandered Bernie in the primaries and they slander Jill Stein today. These people aren't liberal. They are corperatist sheep.
The four way polling shows Gary and Jill taking slightly more away form Hilary than Donald. Most of the Republicans that aren't extreme nationalists or Fascists (especially those who like politicians such as Rand and Ron Paul), I would imagine, will be voting for Gary Johnson. Some of the hardcore Ted Cruz supports may vote for Darrell Castle of the Constitution Party (where they can as they currently have access to 276 electoral votes - so in theory Darrell could become president).
If Hilary loses it will be the fault of the DNC, Debbie Do-Anything-For-Hilary and Hilary herself. The DNC has sadly given weight to Donald's claims of a "rigged system" and if Hilary wins he will justified in being suspicious of the result given how easy it is to hack voting machines. If left-wing voters aren't convinced by Hilary (maybe because she's ignoring them and rushing to appease the sorts of people who actually like Jeb Bush) there's no law saying they have to vote for her, and I believe Donald in the Oval Office will result fewer deaths of American soldiers in pointless wars.
Q:
Quote:If this is a non issue ask yourself why would anyone invest an effort in her defense? If this is pneumonia like they said then the only thing need be said is wait two weeks and see for yourself. Or better yet if it was a matter of hydration why not just say give her water, and have her dance a jig after she recovers...
If it's just Pneumonia then it is a non-issue because that alone isn't enough to make her unfit for the Oval Office. I personally think she has Parkinson's, based on what the Parkinson's Foundation (and others) lists as symptoms. But even if we assume I'm right, early Parkinson's isn't enough either. If Hilary's health does become an issue then the Twenty-fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution will come into play and the vice president takes over.
She lied about her health and that is my issue. If she's hiding any other health problems, like I say the twenty-fifty Amendment will kick in and stop her from doing any more damage to the country, and indeed the world. And I'm pretty sure Donald did too when he had they "astonishingly excellent" doctor's note written so I'm sure he's lying too. Donald Trump will not be the healthiest president ever. Gary Johnson might be though, because he's both a marathon runner and a mountain climber - if I remember rightly.
