???? Is No one going to mention the nose dive clinton took at ground zero?

[Neo-Scholastic]

Dirch, I have been one of Hilary's harshest critics and even I have to admit that she currently has no health problems that would exclude her from being president (this may change obviously). She lied about her health, sure, and that is what I was bemoaning. But here's the thing: All of these nonsensical right wing attacks make legitimate criticism of Hilary increasingly hard. People now think everything is a silly GOP attack and it's disheartening.

There's plenty of real scandals you can attack Hilary on, such as:

1. Putting a Clinton Foundation donor on an advisory board for tactical nuclear weapons.

2. All of the other pay to play revelations.

3. Not knowing what the different classification marks on e-mails meant.

4. Siphoning top secret government information to an unguarded homebrew server

5. Accepting money from criminals like al-Saud.

6. Selling weapons to South Sudan, a country known to use child soldiers.

7. Her support of a no-fly-zone over Syria, the same crazy thing people like Chris Christie proposed.

The list goes on and on. Please get informed on the real scandals the cable news hesitates to talk about. Coughing and falling alone, even lying, isn't enough to exclude. I think it could be fun to see Hilary elected simply so I can say to people "Ha! I told you so!"

Indeed, the list goes on and on. I can respect people who believe Clinton's policies would be better, even significantly better, than those of Trump. That is why we hold elections. Even if Trump was the incompetent vulgar buffoon his opponents say he is (which I don't believe) I don't see how anyone can support and enable someone that clearly thinks she is above the law. One of the founding principles of America is that we are a country of laws and not leaders. A vote for Clinton is to disregard that basic principle of democratic governance.