(November 2, 2016 at 2:11 pm)Drich Wrote: positively describing or negatively describing a physical charastic does not make one a bigot. What makes a person a bigot is taking the position that they are better because they have or lack a racial attribute that another race does not.
The term 'Slit or slant eye' is not in of itself racist. It is the context in which that description is used that makes it a racist comment or not.
In like wise fashion saying that gay marriage is becoming compulsory is not an anti gay statement. It simply on the surface describes a societal shift toward gay marriage.
You guys who wear your feelings on your sleeves and look for key words to pigeon hole people and label them XYZ if the say 123 is the epitome of intolerance you d-bag pretend to be against.
Can't you see you are becoming the monsters you pretend to hate? If someone doesn't conform to your world view they are hated and reviled. If someone apposes or just on the surface says something concerning a key word you been trained to hate, you unleash the hell you falsely want to protect others from...
This great hypocrisy is what will define this generation.
![[Image: image_18.jpeg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i1230.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fee488%2FBurrito909%2Fimage_18.jpeg)
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell