Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: February 4, 2025, 4:57 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The curious case of Francis Rawls.
#9
RE: The curious case of Francis Rawls.
(March 25, 2017 at 11:39 pm)Mr Greene Wrote: And they can't just brute force hack it?

The energy requirements to do that might exceed all of the known energy in the Universe:

http://www.muppetlabs.com/~breadbox/txt/rsa.html

(March 25, 2017 at 10:52 pm)Moros Synackaon Wrote: If they have enough to convict, then what are they waiting for?

Agreed.  If they have enough evidence to keep him in jail, then he at least deserves a trial.  I think that it was Thomas Jefferson who said that, "99 guilty should go free before an innocent man is convicted."

(March 25, 2017 at 9:39 pm)mh.brewer Wrote: From the article it appears that they have enough for a conviction without seeing the encrypted files. They know that he down loaded child porn, that should be enough(Quote: police already had forensic evidence that Rawls had child pornography stored on his computer hard drive, including a relative’s statement and electronic fingerprints showing he had downloaded it.). They don't need to see the physical files. (not a lawyer, don't hold me to that)

Rawls should be allowed to claim 5th amendment self incrimination rights. This is no different than a person not disclosing where the body is. 

I looked at the average amount of jail time for child porn possession cases, 18 months appears to be a drop in the bucket. (google it yourself)

I say get on with the case and if (more like when) convicted that will be considered time served. I doubt he'll be jailed for life. That kind of talk is just drama, drama, drama.

Edit: Not even going to discuss framing. What if's are not very productive.

He is probably guilty; however, is it a "beyond-a-reasonable" doubt guilt?  Of course, someone (say, his "vengeful" sister) could have set him up, downloading the porn while she (or, for that matter, someone else) had access to his computer.

By the way, I work in IT (over 20 years), and gaining access to someone's computer is trivially easy.  Getting by a Window's password is a piece of cake, hardly any trouble at all.  All that one has to do is to pull the hard drive, and from there, you can install whatever legitimate software that you want to gain access.  In fact, hacking someone's router is just as easy, as most people choose really shitty passwords, which can be cracked via offline attacks -- capture the encrypted cipher and then bust it.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
The curious case of Francis Rawls. - by Jehanne - March 25, 2017 at 3:09 pm
RE: The curious case of Francis Rawls. - by Minimalist - March 25, 2017 at 7:18 pm
RE: The curious case of Francis Rawls. - by CapnAwesome - March 25, 2017 at 8:34 pm
RE: The curious case of Francis Rawls. - by Edwardo Piet - March 25, 2017 at 8:35 pm
RE: The curious case of Francis Rawls. - by brewer - March 25, 2017 at 9:39 pm
RE: The curious case of Francis Rawls. - by Thumpalumpacus - March 26, 2017 at 12:36 am
RE: The curious case of Francis Rawls. - by Autumnlicious - March 25, 2017 at 10:52 pm
RE: The curious case of Francis Rawls. - by Isis - March 27, 2017 at 4:53 pm
RE: The curious case of Francis Rawls. - by Mr Greene - March 25, 2017 at 11:39 pm
RE: The curious case of Francis Rawls. - by Jehanne - March 25, 2017 at 11:53 pm
RE: The curious case of Francis Rawls. - by brewer - March 26, 2017 at 7:48 am
RE: The curious case of Francis Rawls. - by Jehanne - March 26, 2017 at 8:50 am
RE: The curious case of Francis Rawls. - by brewer - March 26, 2017 at 9:36 am
RE: The curious case of Francis Rawls. - by Jehanne - March 26, 2017 at 9:53 am
RE: The curious case of Francis Rawls. - by brewer - March 26, 2017 at 9:56 am
RE: The curious case of Francis Rawls. - by Jehanne - March 26, 2017 at 10:19 am
RE: The curious case of Francis Rawls. - by Secular Elf - March 27, 2017 at 3:15 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Bounty Hunters found not guilty in case of gunning down innocent black man Cecelia 21 2174 August 3, 2019 at 8:49 pm
Last Post: Fireball
  Former judge files new motions pushing for special prosecutor in Jussie Smollett case EgoDeath 15 2086 July 1, 2019 at 12:21 am
Last Post: EgoDeath
  Trump responds to special counsel Robert Mueller’s statement: ‘The case is closed WinterHold 21 3111 June 7, 2019 at 2:28 am
Last Post: WinterHold
  Lastest development in Smollett case EgoDeath 76 9130 March 12, 2019 at 4:48 pm
Last Post: EgoDeath
  Pope Francis Abuse Scandal Catholic_Lady 101 14410 September 5, 2018 at 6:59 pm
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  The Cake Case Revisited Silver 108 30128 October 6, 2017 at 11:00 pm
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  In Case Anyone Thinks Trumptards Have A Shred of Decency Minimalist 17 3504 July 31, 2017 at 3:08 am
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  The Strange Case Of Canuck The Crow Amarok 0 1077 June 27, 2017 at 1:25 pm
Last Post: Amarok
  Bill Cosby Case: mistrial Silver 27 9662 June 24, 2017 at 8:53 pm
Last Post: Seraphina
  The Slants Win Supreme Court Case chimp3 5 1489 June 22, 2017 at 5:31 am
Last Post: chimp3



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)