(March 2, 2018 at 5:43 pm)SteveII Wrote:(March 1, 2018 at 9:15 pm)Jehanne Wrote: A good debate, that Craig (at least in my opinion) lost. I could only think, "The Emperor has no clothes..." while listening to Professor Wielenberg dissect Craig's theology, point by point.
I bet you don't even know Wielenberg's moral theory (of course you will go look now). Go ahead, explain it. Then explain why it is not an utterly crazy theory (even though I bet no one here buys it at all).
More plausible than Craig's wacky theism, but no, I don't agree with every thing that Wielenberg said, but at least he is trying to give a naturalistic account of objective moral values, if there are such. Unlike you, Wielenberg does not claim certainty for his ideas.
