(March 23, 2018 at 7:37 pm)Khemikal Wrote: My life is temporary. The systems will persists, and people who are still alive will continue to do things, informed by those systems, with consequences. That this is "moral" is just a matter of definition. It's what we're talking about.
Now, I want you to take a breath. No, really..stop and take a breath. Can you see how a person..seeing some of these questions..might doubt that you even have a moral sense to begin with, or have any idea what anyone is talking about when they discuss morality? Is that what you want to communicate? Is that really accurate, in regards to yourself?
What makes one moral view any better than another, when in the end, there is nothing but a howling wind in the desert?
I am discussing the evolutionary slant and nothing else.
What is 'moral sense,' when it's temporal, circumstantial, changeable and purely relative?
How can you even start by naming something as if it has an ounce of 'righteousness' ?
