The laws of God match the needs of the physical universe to have life and quality of life.
The immediate opposing response to that is -nature breaks those rules.
The laws of God describe a harmonious existence for all living creatures, if nature was fully respondent to them, we would have a perfect world, without death, decay and violence.
The infidel dismisses the law of God and presumes that the world is just a horrendous circus of mutations and survival. Granted of course that nature has mysteriously borrowed the tenacity for life, and a sense of perfectly designed conditions necessary for life, when there wasn't and isn't any logical reason for it to be so.
In this mental scenario, sin doesn't exist and it cannot be said that there is any such thing as morality, since in evolution that is always relative, it has absolutely no reference point, and it is certainly not permanent.
What is defined as crime in that society, can only boil down to a principle that concerns a moral issue, or sin, a thing which directly affects physical life and its relationships.
So there cannot be any such thing as a "crime" if nature has no tenacity for life, and even more so, if nature didn't need the right and perfect conditions to flourish.
But perfect conditions are necessary for life, and are not accidental, never have been and never will be.
Perfect conditions, organisations and design setups DO NOT happen in anything that isn't caused by nature, which is made by God, and which has been subject to the effects of sin.
If they did, we wouldn't need factories, all we'd have to do is stumble across the fully developed item in the jungle.
The immediate opposing response to that is -nature breaks those rules.
The laws of God describe a harmonious existence for all living creatures, if nature was fully respondent to them, we would have a perfect world, without death, decay and violence.
The infidel dismisses the law of God and presumes that the world is just a horrendous circus of mutations and survival. Granted of course that nature has mysteriously borrowed the tenacity for life, and a sense of perfectly designed conditions necessary for life, when there wasn't and isn't any logical reason for it to be so.
In this mental scenario, sin doesn't exist and it cannot be said that there is any such thing as morality, since in evolution that is always relative, it has absolutely no reference point, and it is certainly not permanent.
What is defined as crime in that society, can only boil down to a principle that concerns a moral issue, or sin, a thing which directly affects physical life and its relationships.
So there cannot be any such thing as a "crime" if nature has no tenacity for life, and even more so, if nature didn't need the right and perfect conditions to flourish.
But perfect conditions are necessary for life, and are not accidental, never have been and never will be.
Perfect conditions, organisations and design setups DO NOT happen in anything that isn't caused by nature, which is made by God, and which has been subject to the effects of sin.
If they did, we wouldn't need factories, all we'd have to do is stumble across the fully developed item in the jungle.
