Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 27, 2024, 6:39 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Philosophy of Mind: Zombies, "radical emergence" and evidence of non-experiential
#46
RE: The Philosophy of Mind: Zombies, "radical emergence" and evidence of non-experiential
(April 22, 2018 at 12:15 pm)Khemikal Wrote:
Quote:To a non-conscious robot, a painting it interacts with is only a noumenal object, it's not experienced as a 'painting' like it is to us.
-and?  

What does a robot and what it does (or doesn't do or experience) have to do with a human being, what it does or experiences, and what evolutionary advantages that conferred or contributed to?

The fact you say "and?" to that shows you don't understand it.

Now you've regressed so far you're just cherrypicking half of a sentence in my gigantic post. You reply to 5% of what I say and don't even accurately address any of it.

You're getting worse. The amount of questions you've ignored, the amount of times you've misrepresented me. You're beyond help in this discussion. You're a waste of energy. You're not even discussing with me, you're just interacting with your own cartoon version of my points in your own head. You've shown you're incapable of having a discussion with me and you're going back on block/ignore. I have better people to talk to (pretty much anyone who actually responds to my points, whether they do it well or not).

You have failed to address my point that whilst art and civilization wouldn't still exist as phenomenal objects without qualia (by definition), they'd still exist as noumenal objects... so by building phenomenology into the definition of all of the objects themselves you're simply begging the question.

What does a robot have to do with it?... lmao. I was drawing an analogy. I was saying that without qualia the painting would still exist in the same way that it would to a non-conscious robot. There would still be the noumenal object of the painting. The robot simply wouldn't see what we think of as a 'painting'. You've gone from terrible at discussion to worse than terrible at discussion and are a complete waste of my energy. I may as well be talking to a brick wall. You're probably stoned lol. Bye Khem.

EDIT: Oh hang on you added more text into your post.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: The Philosophy of Mind: Zombies, "radical emergence" and evidence of non-experiential - by Edwardo Piet - April 22, 2018 at 12:23 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  How worthless is Philosophy? vulcanlogician 127 12009 May 20, 2024 at 12:19 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Philosophy Recommendations Harry Haller 21 3080 January 5, 2024 at 10:58 am
Last Post: HappySkeptic
  The Philosophy Of Stupidity. disobey 51 5640 July 27, 2023 at 3:02 am
Last Post: Carl Hickey
  Does the fact that many non-human animals have pituitary disprove Cartesian Dualism? FlatAssembler 36 3242 June 23, 2023 at 9:36 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Hippie philosophy Fake Messiah 19 2132 January 21, 2023 at 1:56 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  Understanding the rudiment has much to give helps free that mind for further work. highdimensionman 16 1719 May 24, 2022 at 6:31 am
Last Post: highdimensionman
  [Serious] Generally speaking, is philosophy a worthwhile subject of study? Disagreeable 238 19989 May 21, 2022 at 10:38 am
Last Post: highdimensionman
  Metaethics Part 1: Cognitivism/Non-cognitivism Disagreeable 24 2371 February 11, 2022 at 6:46 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  My philosophy about Religion SuicideCommando01 18 3416 April 5, 2020 at 9:52 pm
Last Post: SuicideCommando01
  In Defense of a Non-Natural Moral Order Acrobat 84 9643 August 30, 2019 at 3:02 pm
Last Post: LastPoet



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)