(October 17, 2018 at 4:42 pm)Grandizer Wrote: And you know what, I agree 100% with you, even on the intentionalist fallacy part (first time I hear this fallacy, btw).
First time for me as well. I wonder about it though (maybe I need to research it more), because it seems that trying to get at an author's intention is a valid way (one way among many, that is) to decipher an ambiguous text.
