RE: Atheist Bible Study 1: Genesis
October 29, 2018 at 1:40 pm
(This post was last modified: October 29, 2018 at 2:52 pm by Bucky Ball.)
Drich
All totally irrelevant, and YOU, YOU ... have not addressed EVEN ONE point the Israeli archaeologists make.
You are no Christian. NO Christian swears at people like you do, or calls people names like "retard". You do follow the example of Trump, not Jesus, you hypocritical bastard.
It's "there ARE", not there "is" when it refers to a plural reference. Did you ever go to school ? Ever ?
It's "TOO" M-Fing stupid, not "to" M-Fing stupid. You are SO incredibly ignorant you can't even insult correctly. LOL.
"aberham" ?? It's "Abraham" dear. Do try to go back and finish 6th Grade .... ASAP.
Meanwhile put me on ignore, please. You are an ignoramus, and beneath contempt. Tell your Jebus to send in the Varsity, not the B squad benchwarmers, sport.
aberham ..... in-fucking-deed.
LMAO
There are no gods. You have no evidence of any gods.
Take your shit cult and peddle it somewhere else.
No serious scholar of the OT takes it literally any longer. They haven't for at least 75 years.
Ever since (in the 1950's) the most prominent Conservative Biblical Scholars said (in the 13 Volume "Interpreters Bible") it could not be taken literally, the consensus in academics, is that it cannot be taken literally.
You are simply utterly ignorant of the current state of scholarship.
James 1:26
"Those who consider themselves religious and yet do not keep a tight rein on their tongues deceive themselves, and their religion is worthless."
LOL
Quote:no no no you are jumping the gun retard... I listed three videos.. one of the mention the ring/royal seal. there is literally hundreds of other points and pieces of evidence between the other two videos.. Jorge invalidated one and only did so by pointing out there was a semitic king of egypt of the same name as what was on the seal.. (the video says Joseph was that king) And the wiki page says nut-huh.. To which i conceded because the point was still made..
And assuming now... you are to M-f-ing stupid to understand the significance of that, allow me to explain semite= what Jews were known as before the exodus. Semite king= pre-Jews in egypt... think about it moron. even if this was not Joseph (which is all Jorge's reference trs to dispel which a counter argument could be made) the underlying argument that there were "jews" in egypt is settled. Which means you BS paper is garbage. Technically again they were not jews till they received the law well after the exodus, but they were semites, the same semite found in the northern delta where this royal seal was found. the jews left and the semites stayed, but before the exodus they were all semites..
As far as explain why Joseph's would have his fathers name on it was because that is in tradition with the pharaohs. they never took a common name they always aligned themselves with great men or great names. Jacob is the greatest in his short line (aberham disgraced himself before a previous king by telling him his wife was his sister and the tried married her before God intervened.)
All totally irrelevant, and YOU, YOU ... have not addressed EVEN ONE point the Israeli archaeologists make.
You are no Christian. NO Christian swears at people like you do, or calls people names like "retard". You do follow the example of Trump, not Jesus, you hypocritical bastard.
It's "there ARE", not there "is" when it refers to a plural reference. Did you ever go to school ? Ever ?
It's "TOO" M-Fing stupid, not "to" M-Fing stupid. You are SO incredibly ignorant you can't even insult correctly. LOL.
"aberham" ?? It's "Abraham" dear. Do try to go back and finish 6th Grade .... ASAP.
Meanwhile put me on ignore, please. You are an ignoramus, and beneath contempt. Tell your Jebus to send in the Varsity, not the B squad benchwarmers, sport.
aberham ..... in-fucking-deed.
LMAO
There are no gods. You have no evidence of any gods.
Take your shit cult and peddle it somewhere else.
(October 29, 2018 at 1:31 pm)Drich Wrote:(October 29, 2018 at 12:13 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Simcha Jacobovici is a charlatan. The writer/producer of The Naked Archaeologist he was once told by real archaeologist, Aren Maier ( excavating Gath in Israel even now ) that "you are not naked and you are not an archaeologist."
You're a jerk dripshit. You accept with total credulity whenever some shithead tells you what you want to hear. Probably explains why you are a fucking jesus freak in the first place. No bullshit filters at all in your head!
bla bla bla ....
No serious scholar of the OT takes it literally any longer. They haven't for at least 75 years.
Ever since (in the 1950's) the most prominent Conservative Biblical Scholars said (in the 13 Volume "Interpreters Bible") it could not be taken literally, the consensus in academics, is that it cannot be taken literally.
You are simply utterly ignorant of the current state of scholarship.
James 1:26
"Those who consider themselves religious and yet do not keep a tight rein on their tongues deceive themselves, and their religion is worthless."
LOL
Every religion is true one way or another. It is true when understood metaphorically. But when it gets stuck in its own metaphors, interpreting them as facts, then you are in trouble. - Joseph Campbell 
Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist

Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist