RE: Atheist Bible Study 1: Genesis
November 4, 2018 at 6:38 pm
(This post was last modified: November 4, 2018 at 7:20 pm by Bucky Ball.)
There was no trial (of Jesus). Galilean wandering peasant preachers were never brought in front of Roman aristocrats. They did not involve themselves with local religious squabbles. Jerusalem was an occupied city. In the Pax Romana, trouble-makers in occupied cities were routinely executed with no trial, per "standing-order". The notion that somehow anyone "recognized" someone as *the Son of God* is utterly preposterous. First of all the Romans didn't buy that Yahweh was a god, so obviously they couldn't. For Jews, being called a "son of God" was a general honorific title, given to many men ... righteous men, politicians, generals, public heroes ... etc. It never meant *the* son of god ... in terms of the specialized nonsense that Christians hijacked the term to mean. It's not what Jews meant by it. Claiming equality with Yahweh was not something a Jew would even recognize. The Christian story was totally invented ... and falls totally apart under scrutiny.
Every religion is true one way or another. It is true when understood metaphorically. But when it gets stuck in its own metaphors, interpreting them as facts, then you are in trouble. - Joseph Campbell 
Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist

Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist