Atheist Bible Study 1: Genesis

[Drich]

bla bla bla

Whatever drugs you're on, dude, you should stop taking them.
AGAIN, put me on ignore. I have no plans to waste any time on your foolish rubbish.
You are an ignoramus. You have a 3rd Grade understanding of these matters.
Your garbage is not worth wasting even 1 second on.

Your conclusion about Pilate and Roman sources was so off the wall, it's just bizarre. I myself used a Roman source.
The distinction I made went over your head. You got nothing.
Nothing.

this is where your mind closes and you fail.

Rather than address what was topically said. you here move to dismiss. or formally Argumentum ad lapidem it is a logically fallacy used to trivialize and dismiss without actually addressing the topic.. like how you said: "The distinction I made went over your head. You got nothing. " means nothing because it is an appeal to stone with out proof of anything.. 

This is the weak minded way out this is you hitting the panic stop button because you are in over your head or simply do not want to continue. so now I get to do my victory lap and ignore any more insults or quipts because you are the one who gave up pretending I do not understand you... when in fact that is all I do is explain to you douches what you do not understand about what i said.. It ironic the first time the you think the burden of explanation is placed on you, you claim victory and All i do is simply show you you errors in comprehension!

For example you did not quote a roman source (primary source)  you quoted a commentary concerning pilate (tertiary source) because there is only one mention of pontius pilate in all of antiquity outside of what you people deemed to be 'religious texts.' this source was found in 1961. meaning there literally is only one mention of pontius pilate outside of the religious sources which you dismiss that has his name and rank which can be dated to this time. everything else is speculation and filler. Do you not see how bull shit history is on your side without the supplemental 'religious texts.'  Your Side could not even verify pontius pilate as a regional governor even though there were tons of official documents at one time concerning everything he was did and his day to day there. all that is left was a name rank and serial number so to speak on a stone found in the region.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/peopl...84786.html

Now with this one mentioning found in 1961 mind you, you are all so proud you won this argument, failing to address the point i made. in that if pilate can be confirmed as a person in your world and you can create such commentaries as you quoted from from one single mentioning... you can not logically or ethically dismiss Jesus Christ who has over 25,000 different manuscripts written about him or some deed or aspect of his life.

That is the part you don't want to face

Which is what lead to your appeal to stone and premature victory lap.