Atheist Bible Study 1: Genesis

[Angrboda]

In the first case, what you have is some internet rando reinterpreting Norse legend.  In the same vein, if some internet weirdo referred to Mickey Mouse as a rat, that wouldn't bear any weight in establishing that Mickey Mouse was indeed a rat.  What is relevant is what the Norse who created the legends meant, and for that you need to bring evidence that the Norse had the concept of a dragon, a word for it in their language, and that they referred to Jormungandr in those terms in the original sagas.  Until you do, it's simply unknown whether Jormungandr was a dragon or not.  But given that you research everything in depth, the answers to these questions should already be in your notes on the matter.  I will await your enlightening me on this matter, as I simply do not know.

Nevermind. Dragon is correct. So all told you're 1 for 3 so far. Still need to see evidence that Thor opposed the serpent because the serpent was angry, and that I am in fact a lady.