RE: Atheist Bible Study 1: Genesis
November 28, 2018 at 2:17 pm
(This post was last modified: November 28, 2018 at 2:24 pm by Angrboda.)
Drich, the part of your source that is relevant was the part that contradicted the claim you were making. This idea that the part that contradicted you is not relevant to the claim you were making is sheer bollocks. That you want to pretend that it wasn't is just more evidence that you are too incompetent to continue breathing, or simply too dishonest and lacking in integrity to care. Neither absolves you of responsibility.
And no, your rationalization as to Jormungandr being a dragon doesn't wash. The meaning of dragon as serpent would flow to Jormungandr if indeed dragon as serpent were current usage, but it is not. So, no, it has nothing to do with applying a general term to something specific or the reverse. That idea is just more proof that your brain is broken.
As to Rosenberg, I am not depending on your representation for my conclusion. When it looked like we were going to be rehashing the discussion in the context of your argument that I was not substantively addressing your posts, I went back and did my own research and found that the sources do not bear out your theory. So, no, your notion that I'm simply not giving you credit for the aces up your sleeve doesn't pan out as it appears you have no aces up your sleeve. I, on the other hand, do.
And no, as my confronting you in that thread in which you accused me of not substantively engaging with you shows, I do not simply throw away your opinions on the basis that you are a fucking idiot. I do, however, attack those opinions where you clearly demonstrate that you are a fucking idiot. That's somewhat unfair, as it may give someone the impression that I think you are always wrong, but it's hardly a selectivity that I can be faulted for.
So, no, once again, all you show is that you're an idiot who is full of himself and makes bullshit excuses so he can rationalize his behavior, even though said excuses tend to be filled with the same type of errors the opinions they are meant to defend are.
And you're still 0 for 3 on the Jormungandr front, in case anybody is keeping count.
And no, I'm not even a little miffed. To quote Jeffrey Dahmer, "I eat guys like you for breakfast." I enjoy crucifying you and your stupidly boneheaded arguments. It gives me a lady boner.
I have to seriously wonder who your audience is these days. The only person convinced by your lame ass rebuttals is you, while I continue to crush you in the eyes of anybody with half a brain. The only thing I can see that you are accomplishing is undermining the credibility which your stated mission here depends upon. These rebuttals of yours do nothing but cut off your nose to spite your face. You would be wise to ignore me, but we know wisdom is something you lack.
And no, your rationalization as to Jormungandr being a dragon doesn't wash. The meaning of dragon as serpent would flow to Jormungandr if indeed dragon as serpent were current usage, but it is not. So, no, it has nothing to do with applying a general term to something specific or the reverse. That idea is just more proof that your brain is broken.
As to Rosenberg, I am not depending on your representation for my conclusion. When it looked like we were going to be rehashing the discussion in the context of your argument that I was not substantively addressing your posts, I went back and did my own research and found that the sources do not bear out your theory. So, no, your notion that I'm simply not giving you credit for the aces up your sleeve doesn't pan out as it appears you have no aces up your sleeve. I, on the other hand, do.
And no, as my confronting you in that thread in which you accused me of not substantively engaging with you shows, I do not simply throw away your opinions on the basis that you are a fucking idiot. I do, however, attack those opinions where you clearly demonstrate that you are a fucking idiot. That's somewhat unfair, as it may give someone the impression that I think you are always wrong, but it's hardly a selectivity that I can be faulted for.
So, no, once again, all you show is that you're an idiot who is full of himself and makes bullshit excuses so he can rationalize his behavior, even though said excuses tend to be filled with the same type of errors the opinions they are meant to defend are.
And you're still 0 for 3 on the Jormungandr front, in case anybody is keeping count.
And no, I'm not even a little miffed. To quote Jeffrey Dahmer, "I eat guys like you for breakfast." I enjoy crucifying you and your stupidly boneheaded arguments. It gives me a lady boner.
I have to seriously wonder who your audience is these days. The only person convinced by your lame ass rebuttals is you, while I continue to crush you in the eyes of anybody with half a brain. The only thing I can see that you are accomplishing is undermining the credibility which your stated mission here depends upon. These rebuttals of yours do nothing but cut off your nose to spite your face. You would be wise to ignore me, but we know wisdom is something you lack.
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)