Arguments against existence of God.

[Angrboda]

I think it's a stretch to say anything doesn't exist unless we can demonstrate it's supposed to be within a closed system and we have absolute knowledge of everything within that system.  I don't believe that pink unicorns exist, but they very well could beyond my scope of vision.  If I limit it to existence within a closed room I'm in, then it becomes physically evident if I don't see at least one pink unicorn running around.

Great. Then we grant provisional existence to every batshit thing and have to incorporate an infinite class of nonexistent things into our contingencies.

Sounds like a stealth version of Pascal's Wager, with all its itinerant flaws, not the least of which is inconsistency and an inability to act due to the sheer number of possible worlds to be contemplated.

This is simply the gambit of those who want you to take their ideas seriously, but not anybody else's. It is simply a way to smuggle a special pleading into the discussion under the guise of being reasonable.

Nobody reasons this way, and for good reason.