(September 21, 2021 at 9:42 am)The Grand Nudger Wrote: Thereyet asked which migrants we were responsible for, not who could come or who could stay. The answer is -all of them, as per our law-. In fact..again as per our law, anyone can come and make a claim - but we've been intentionally fucking up there..too.
Yes, even the ones offshore, btw. The coastguard routinely violated the rights of refugees and believed it to be an acceptable and common practice. Your experience is an attestation to that. The coast guard, for it's part, claims that the us has routinely violated -it's- rights..... Talk about a pirate ship full of bilge rat pricks.
To nativists....the cruelty, ambiguity, and impotency of our policies and those protections our law affords is the point. To have it as fucked up as possible is the goal. That, they imagine, will dissuade invaders. Thinking that you aren't responsible by law or imagining that the law didn't say so... just because you personally abandoned your duties in that regard with the blessing of your superiors... is too silly to comment any further on.
Ironically, the recent scotus decision stripping immigration policy of it's near-sacred character as the sole purview of the executive will probably end up doing more good than harm, even though it was intentionally made to cause further harm.
I have just been trying to get the rules/laws. You have been the one to make an attempt to provide such. Thank you.
I'm your huckleberry.
